Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Use the graph to answer the following questions:</u>
When did she start using her phone?
When did she start charging her phone?
While she was using her phone, at what rate was Lin’s phone battery dying?
<u>From 100% to 40% between 2PM and 4 PM:</u>
- (100 - 40)/(4 - 2) = 60/2 = 30% per hour
Answer:
<em>U'</em>(3, -6), <em>V</em><em>'</em>(8, -1), <em>W</em><em>'</em>(3, -1)
Step-by-step explanation:
According to the <em>180°-rotation rule</em>, you take the OPPOSITE of both the y-coordinate and x-coordinate:
<u>Extended Rotation Rules</u>
270°-clockwise rotation [90°-counterclockwise rotation] >> (x, y) → (-y, x)
270°-counterclockwise rotation [90°-clockwise rotation] >> (x, y) → (y, -x)
180°-rotation >> (x, y) → (-x, -y)
I am joyous to assist you anytime.
Answer:
Yes, Cam's costs proportional to the number of votes he receives.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is given that Cam is a corrupt politician. Nobody votes for him except those he pays to do so. It costs Cam exactly $100 to buy each vote.
Let the number of votes he get be x.
Then the total cost of Cam is
... (1)
Where, C is Cam's costs and x is number of votes he receives.
Two variables are proportional to each other if
... (2)
Where k is constant of proportionality.
Since equation (1) and (2) and similar and the constant of proportionality is 100, therefore we say that Cam's costs proportional to the number of votes he receives.
P+5m+2p+8
I believe.
Simply apply the rule of distributive property.
