1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bad White [126]
3 years ago
5

Which of the following cases established testimony by expert witness?

Law
1 answer:
Ksivusya [100]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Judge is the gatekeeper

The judge is to decide whether the expert is qualified to deliver reliable testimony and whether the expert's report is sufficiently reliable to be helpful to the Trier of Fact.

Rule 702 Testimony by Experts

1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data

2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods.

The Supreme Court identified four tests that can be used by the gatekeeper-judge to determine whether to admit the expert testimony. It is typically understood that it is not necessary for the expert testimony to pass all four tests.

1) Tested - Whether the theory or technique used by the expert can be, and has been, tested

2) Peer Review - Whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review and publication

3) Error Rate - The known or potential rate of error of the method used is known or predictable

4) General Acceptance - The degree of the method's or conclusion's acceptance within the relevant scientific community

Review of five court cases

1) Frye v. United States - 1923 - established the "general acceptance" principle

2) Federal Rules of Evidence - Rule 702 - 1975 - established the rule for "scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge" expert witness testimony

3) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals - 1993 - established the four-part Daubert test for evaluating expert testimony

4) GE v. Joiner - 1997 - confirmed the trial judge's gatekeeper role

5) Kumho Tire v. Carmichael - 1999 - expanded the Daubert tests to apply to all disciplines

United States v. 14.38 Acres of Land

A good example of the application of the Daubert Test.

This is a rare case where the appellate court overruled the trial judge's gatekeeper role.

Gatekeeper is not intended to serve as a replacement for the adversary system: Vigorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof are the traditional and appropriate means of attacking shaky but admissible evidence.

Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

To secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding. In other words, the purpose is to make the process more efficient.

The report must contain:

(i) a complete statement of all opinions the witness will express and the basis and reasons for them;

(ii) the data or other information considered by the witness in forming them;

(iii) any exhibits that will be used to summarize or support them;

(iv) the witness's qualifications, including a list of all publications authored in the previous 10 years;

(v) a list of all other cases in which, during the previous 4 years, the witness testified as an expert at trial or by deposition; and

(vi) a statement of the compensation to be paid for the study and testimony in the case.

That written report must contain, at a minimum, six items:

1) All opinions the witness will express and their foundation and reasoning;

2) Data and information considered by the witness;

3) Any exhibits that will be used while giving the testimony in court;

4) Witness qualifications, including all publications authored in the previous 10 years;

5) List of all other cases in the last four years where testimony was given as an expert at trial or deposition;

6) Description of the compensation for the study and testimony.

An appraisal report may need to be quite detailed. This may be at odds with the request of retaining counsel, who may want a less detailed report.

Report should include any exhibits which the witness anticipates using as "demonstrative evidence" during testimony.

report should include a statement of publications and testimony for the prescribed periods.

Some items of interest in this Rule are:

1 - If an objection is raised by one of the attorneys, the deponent will still be required to provide an answer, but that answer will be subject to approval by the court after hearing the objection.

2 - The deponent may refuse to answer a question only when it is necessary to preserve a privilege, enforce a limitation directly by the court, or present a motion under Rule 30(d)(4).

3 - The maximum time limit for a deposition is one day of seven hours.

4 - The deponent has the right to review and correct the transcript. He or she will have 30 days after receiving the transcript to review and submit corrections. However, this right must be affirmed and requested during the deposition. It is recommended that the appraiser expert always request this right to review and correct, as it will provide the appraiser with a copy of the transcript of the "oral report" for his or her workfile.

Rule 33 - Interrogatories to Parties

The time limit to respond is 30 days from the date of service of the interrogatories.

You might be interested in
Which of the following is NOT a reason for implementing Intermediate Sanctions?
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Answer: Lack of evidence that the offender was actually guilty

Explanation:

Intermediate sanctions do not involve the person going to prison but they are quite intrusive as they include (but are not limited to): intensive supervision and electronic monitoring. Most people believe they should be used as punishment for nonviolent <u>crime</u>.

The keyword above is ''crime''. If there is a lack of evidence that a person committed a crime then they are presumed innocent which means they did not commit the crime in question and so do not qualify for intermediate sanctions.

3 0
3 years ago
What is the tittle of P.D. 1181?​
bagirrra123 [75]

10 U.S. Code § 1181 - Authority to establish procedures to consider the separation of officers for substandard performance of duty and for certain other reasons.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Summarize Arizona v Evans
Strike441 [17]

Answer:

United States Supreme Court case in which the Court instituted an exclusionary rule exception allowing evidence obtained through a warrant less search to be valid when a police record erroneously indicates the existence of an outstanding warrant due to negligent conduct of a Clerk of Court.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Who has to confirm (approve) of presidential appointments to the Cabinet and Supreme Court?
Gnesinka [82]

Answer:

From its earliest years, the Senate has jealously guarded its power to review and approve or reject presidential appointees to executive and judicial branch posts. In its history, the Senate has confirmed 126 Supreme Court nominations and well over 500 Cabinet nominations.

Explanation:

Hope this helps you! :)

6 0
3 years ago
Ba lần phân công lao động nguyên nhân gián tiếp dẫn đến sự hình thành nhà nước
tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

<h3>Bắt nạt là một thói quen của một người trong đó họ lợi dụng người khác thông qua thể chất, lời nói, tình cảm, xã hội và thậm chí trong thế giới internet hoặc bắt nạt trên mạng. Điều này thường xảy ra với những người có mong muốn khác và muốn đạt được nó một cách nhanh nhất nên hãy dùng vũ lực để đạt được nó.</h3><h3 /><h3>Một số nguyên nhân gây ra hiện tượng xuất tinh ra máu như sau:</h3><h3>Họ muốn thống trị, thống trị và được công nhận trong môi trường mà họ thuộc về vì lợi ích cá nhân.</h3><h3>Vì khó chịu, bực bội và cực kỳ tức giận trước tình huống hoặc người đó nên nó dồn nén xung lực lên một người khác mà chúng ta biết sẽ không trả đũa.</h3><h3>Ngoài ra một trong những nguyên nhân khiến người khác xuất tinh là vì muốn trả thù cho lần xuất tinh đã xảy ra với mình. Bị kiềm chế và không thể trả đũa người đã làm việc đó, nạn nhân cũng tìm đến những người quen trẻ hơn họ, những người mà họ biết là yếu và họ biết họ sẽ không bị trả thù.</h3><h3>Tác động của xuất tinh là gì:</h3><h3>Nạn nhân bị bắt nạt thường phải trải qua nỗi buồn và trầm cảm rất lớn. Do sự khác biệt lớn trong hành vi và không có khả năng tự vệ trước những kẻ bắt nạt, hầu hết nạn nhân trở nên trầm cảm và trải qua những thay đổi trong cách họ suy nghĩ, giao tiếp xã hội và tương tác với người khác cũng như đối phó với những người khác.</h3><h3>Đối với các học sinh, những trải nghiệm sôi sục thông thường là cảm giác sợ hãi và e ngại, điều này lặp lại những điều đã xảy ra với anh ta. Kết quả là đứa trẻ không muốn đến trường. Họ xa cách với những người làm tổn thương và lạm dụng điểm yếu của họ.</h3><h3>Khi không được điều trị, một số nạn nhân đã tự tử vì quá áp lực và xấu hổ.</h3><h3>Cách đối phó với những kẻ bắt nạt bạn:</h3><h3>Nếu bạn sôi nổi, hãy khoan dung những lời đã nói và hãy kiên nhẫn. Như câu nói, "hãy kéo dài sợi dây của bạn ..." Chúng ta hãy học cách tha thứ và quan tâm đầy đủ đến những điều khác có ý nghĩa hơn.</h3><h3>Tránh xa hoặc chạy (nếu cần) đến người đang làm bạn sôi sục</h3><h3>       anh ta không thành công trong việc muốn gây rối.</h3><h3 /><h3>Nhấn mạnh những nhiệm vụ có ý nghĩa hơn trách nhiệm và chống lại những kẻ bắt nạt.</h3><h3>Để biết thêm thông tin về hiện tượng sủi bọt, bạn có thể mở các liên kết bên dưới:</h3><h3 /><h3>Ảnh hưởng của bắt nạt đối với học sinh.</h3><h3>Nguyên nhân và ảnh hưởng của việc bắt nạt brainly.ph/question/599432</h3><h3 /><h3>#LearnWithBrainly</h3>

Explanation:

<h2><u><em>#Vietnamese</em></u></h2><h2><u><em /></u></h2><h2><u><em /></u></h2><h2><u><em>#AnswerForTrees</em></u></h2>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • To buy a house, Mary obtains a thirty-year mortgage with an interest rate that is fixed for three years and then adjusts annuall
    12·1 answer
  • The expression "choreographed trial" refers to
    13·1 answer
  • Which term describes a formal statement naming the plaintiff and the defendant and describing the nature of a civil lawsuit?
    6·2 answers
  • Describe at least three things you could do to uphold the presumption of innocence as a juror is supposed to do.
    5·1 answer
  • At a BAC of___blackouts are common.<br> A. 0.09<br> B. 0.13<br> C. 0.20
    9·1 answer
  • You call in a special favor to your friend at the FBI, and she runs the DNA samples through CODIS. A match returns. It appears t
    14·1 answer
  • What is a possible consequence for failing to investigate a report of unprofessional conduct by a school employee?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following quotes from the Declaration of Independence best reflects the concept of popular sovereignty?
    15·1 answer
  • Keisha is up for promotion in her role. Her boss says she can receive the
    7·1 answer
  • Some attorneys contact many experts as a ploy to disqualify them or prevent opposing counsel from hiring them; this practice is
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!