Answer:
By increasing the amount and so do cell phone consumers, so the price reaches equilibrium.
Explanation:
The law of supply and demand says that if the supply increases, the price or demand may decrease, and if supply decreases, the price or demand may increase. <em>And the reality is that today there is a great deal of supply and variety of cell phones with which a greater amount is acquired by consumers, bringing the price to its equilibrium.
</em>
The number of consumers who can afford a high-end smart phone is less, and in reality it does not affect the equilibrium price much, even due to the fact that several consumers purchase cell phones in rental or credit plans.
The Battle of Salamis was one of the most significant battles in ancient Greece
Answer: Option(a) is correct option
Explanation:
As per theory of Lepper and colleagues (1973), rewards play a major role in motivation of a student for performing activity as compared to non-rewarding activity.They describes about undermine of performance due to presence of reward in certain time and situation.
According to the question, Joseph will tend to paint in future because he has seen it as the method of earning money as reward rather than making it a passion or enjoying painting.He is interest in money majorly
Other options are incorrect because Joseph becoming an artist in future, still carry out painting passion even if aunt stops rewarding him and money rewarding painting are considered better than no-money rewarding painting are not the outcome of scenario. Thus, the correct option is option(a).
Answer:
c) proactive interference
Explanation:
Proactive interference: Proactive interference happens when the past memories of a person hold him or her from retaining and maintaining new memories.
The proactive interference occurs when a person memorizes a piece of information, for example, formulas and when the person is being asked to remember or recall that information then he or she might forget the earlier part of the information.
Example: A man calls his current girlfriend by his ex-girlfriend's name.
In the question above, the difficulty of Janice is best illustrated by the proactive interference.
