Anselm argued that an ideal being is important to exist. during this argument God is an excellent being thus he should exist that is understood because of the ontological argument. Guanilo thought this argument was absurd and he viewed the other. one thing doesn't exist simply because it's excellent and he used the instance of an ideal island. The island is ideal thus in step with Anselm's view it ought to exist however the island stop to exist thus Guanilo planned this argument to be reductio ad absurdum. as compared they each agree that as a result, of one thing is ideal it doesn't exist however in distinction saint believed that God was an exception to the present because God is a whole totally different matter and Gaunilo doesn't believe God is an exception to the present view, though he Guanilo believes in God he doesn't consider the ontological argument as proof of Gods existence.
Answer:
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the most appropriate action would be to send a copy of the informed consent via facsimile to the subject's wife. After she has had the opportunity to speak to the investigator, she can sign the informed consent and fax it back. Doing so would legally bind the consent form so that the consent is valid.
Around in 1996 if that whats your looking for
Answer:She Is Out Later With Her Friends (missing Curfew A Few Times), Has Had A Car Accident In Which Tonya Admitted She Was Texting Her Best Friend, And They Suspect She Might Be Experimenting With Drinking. Explain What Is Happening ... The parents of 16-year old Tonya are very frustrated with their daughter. She.
Explanation:
more POWER
Answer:
b. the inability of rulers to accept change
Explanation:
It was a mockery of bourgeois ideals, a harsh satire on the existing society. The Lilliputian king is very reminiscent of the English King George I. Swift ridiculed inertness and hypocrisy. There is undoubted specificity of the addressees of the Swift merciless, caustic, murderous satire.
