B.Grass, cause without grass there wouldn't be any field mouse and without field mouse there wouldn't be any corn snake and without any corn snake there wouldn't be any hawks
Hope i Helped ^_^
Answer:
population growth
Explanation:
A is the answer. Population growth is the change in the size of the group of the same species over time.
Bless you
For 2,000 mice living in a field, the per capita growth rate is mathematically given as
NT=0.4
<h3>What is the per capita growth rate (rmax) of mice over a month?</h3>
Generally, the birth and death rate is mathematically given as
BT=1000/2000
BT=0.5
Where
DT=200/2000
DT=0.1
In conclusion, per capita growth rate
NT=0.5-0.1
NT=0.4
Read more about Reproduction
brainly.com/question/23471979
Given the age of the meteorite is 4.5 billion years old with 78 atoms of lead-206 the answer should be B. 156. The half-life of uranium-238 in order to decay into lead-206 is 4.46 billion years, which means that the original number of atoms is 156.
Answer:
There are two possible answers: Deep-sea vents provided the energy needed for the first organic compounds to form OR self-replicating RNA molecules passed on genetic information.
Explanation:
The reason for the first answer is due to the hypothesis that indicates that life (organic molecules) arose from inorganic molecules synthesized from the amino acids in those energy vents. This is called the metabolism first hypothesis. The Miller-Urey Experiment provided evidence that organisms could rise from inorganic molecules (they simulated under the conditions you would see on early Earth). The second hypothesis is the RNA World hypothesis (second answer) which suggests that the formation of RNA that could replicate (possible due to mutation or evolution), led to life that could preserve its genetic integrity through replication (greater stability to the organism) and create lipid bi-layer membranes/other organelles. Some scientists support the Metabolism First Hypothesis, while others are skeptical (this goes for the RNA World Hypothesis as well). However, the RNA World Hypothesis is for more reasonable in the fact that its main point is the fact that RNA molecules were able to replicate and maintain genetic stability despite early Earth conditions. Although either hypothesis could explain why all organisms share the same genetic code, the RNA World Hypothesis better explains the universality of DNA/RNA of genes that we see today.
