C. Use the formula for area of a triangle 1/2(Base * Height). Using that we see that we have 1/2(a*b) + 1/2(c*c) + 1/2(a*b). Cleaning this up we get 1/2(2ab+c^2)
Step-by-step explanation
b = 2h is given
2 b + h = 4 hours is given sub in the top equation
2 (2h) + h = 4
5h = 4
h = 4/5 hr or 48 minutes
Answer:
The sequence is:
10, 30, 50, 70, 90.....................
Step-by-step explanation:
We have,
First term (a) = 10
Common difference (d) = ?
Sum of first 5 terms (
) = 250
or, ![\frac{n}{2} [{2a+(n-1)d}] = 250](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7Bn%7D%7B2%7D%20%5B%7B2a%2B%28n-1%29d%7D%5D%20%3D%20250)
or, ![\frac{5}{2} [2*10 + 4d]=250](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B5%7D%7B2%7D%20%5B2%2A10%20%2B%204d%5D%3D250)
or, ![\frac{5}{2} * 4[5+d]=250](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B5%7D%7B2%7D%20%2A%204%5B5%2Bd%5D%3D250)
or, 10(5 + d) =250
or, 5 + d = 25
∴ d = 20
Now,
2nd term = a + d = 10 + 20 = 30
3rd term = a + 2d = 10 + 2*20 = 10 + 40 = 50
4th term = a + 3d = 10 + 3*20 = 10 + 60 = 70
5th term = a + 4d = 10 + 4*20 = 10 + 80 = 90
The closest to the maximum number of cups the punch bowl can hold is 30
<h3>How to determine the number of cups?</h3>
The given parameters are:
1 cup = 15 cubic inches
Diameter of bowl, d = 12 inches
The radius is the half of the diameter.
So, we have:
r = 6
The volume of the bowl is then calculated using:

This gives

Evaluate
V = 452.16
The maximum number of cups is then calculated using:
Cups = 452.16/15
Evaluate
Cups = 30.1444
Approximate
Cups = 30
Hence, the closest to the maximum number of cups the punch bowl can hold is 30
Read more about volumes at:
brainly.com/question/1972490
#SPJ1

The rows add up to

, respectively. (Notice they're all powers of 2)
The sum of the numbers in row

is

.
The last problem can be solved with the binomial theorem, but I'll assume you don't take that for granted. You can prove this claim by induction. When

,

so the base case holds. Assume the claim holds for

, so that

Use this to show that it holds for

.



Notice that






So you can write the expansion for

as

and since

, you have

and so the claim holds for

, thus proving the claim overall that

Setting

gives

which agrees with the result obtained for part (c).