For the year ended December 31, 2018, the warranty-related entry would include a debit to warranty expense of $80,000.
If it's miles impracticable to determine the cumulative impact of applying a trade-in accounting principle, then the new accounting principle should be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. in this situation, the disclosures discussed in FSP 30.4.
Cumulative effect equals the difference between the actual retained profits suggested at the beginning of the yr using the antique approach and the retained income that would have been reported at the start of the year if the brand-new technique had been utilized in earlier years.
Learn more about warranty here brainly.com/question/14227081
#SPJ4
Answer:
a. Land purchased by Sun Company from a local finance company
1) REAL ASSETS, the land exists as a physical asset regardless of the company's transaction.
b. Sun Company's administration building, which houses the finance department
1) REAL ASSETS, the building exists as a physical asset regardless of the company's transaction.
c. Sun Company's inventories of raw materials
1) REAL ASSETS, the inventories exists as a physical asset regardless of the company's transaction.
d. Accounts receivable: money owed to Sun Company by other companies who have purchased products on credits
2) FINANCIAL ASSETS, accounts receivable is a financial concept, not a physical asset
e. Sun Company's corporate checking accounts
2) FINANCIAL ASSETS, checks is a financial concept that represent money, not a physical asset
Yes, It would be advantageous for wynn manufacturing corporation if the cranston division makes the investment under consideration.
- Since managers are charged with maximizing the potential of their own units, it is crucial to frequently assess their performance in the workplace.
- Target measurements can be used to assess managers of investment centers' performance.
- Businesses typically have a target or targeted rate of return they would like to reach in order to assess a project's viability.
- It is profitable for the firm as a whole to move forward with the project in this case because the project's projected return of 18% is higher than the company's desired rate of return of 16%.
To learn more about investment visit:
brainly.com/question/15105766
#SPJ4
Answer:
1. $275 million
Yes
2. 30%
Explanation:
Calculation for the NPV of the investment opportunity
NPV = –100 + 30/0.08
NPV= $275 million
Therefore the NPV will be $275 million
Yes, Based on the above Calculation they should make the investment
2. Calculation for IRR
IRR: 0 = –100 + 30/IRR
Hence,
IRR = 30/100
IRR = 30%
Therefore the IRR will be 30%
The IRR is great only in a situation where the cost of capital does not go beyond 30%.
