Answer:
Impersonation
Explanation:
Impersonation - it is one form of social engineering that focuses is to gain access of the network in order to take advantage of the network for committing fraud or finding any theft. it is different from another form of engineering because it doesn't include phone or mail instead it depends on personal communication.
some form of social engineering is phishing, tailgating, pretexting, etc.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The process of learning involves perception, the way we perceive things from the environment or in school. Then it comes to process the information, which means the wat we think about what we are observing. We reflect on it and conceptualize to better understand. Then, we have to put into action what we learn in order to totally understand it. To master what we learn, we have to practice it once or twice until we get it.
Hello there!
For completing the table, you'll need this information:
REGIONS: Africa-North, Central and South America-Some parts of Asia. SITUATED IN: Areas with low population. OPERATED BY: Landowners and Foremen. WORKERS: From Slave Colonies. Only roof & food were given to them. TYPES OF CROPS: Crops grown for profit (Cotton, Sugar, Tea...) DEFINITION: Big Land Extensions dedicated to the mass-scale production of a certain kind of plant.
Have a nice day!
Answer:
natural and probable consequence
Explanation:
The <u>natural and probable consequence</u> doctrine provides that a person encouraging or facilitating the commission of a crime will be held liable as an accomplice for the crime he or she aided and abetted as well as for the crimes that are a likely and feasible outcome of the criminal conduct
.
The natural and probable consequence doctrine states that an individual who aided another in committing a crime is liable for the crime committed and also for other related crimes which resulted in the process of committing that crime. For example, if an individual aids another the crime of home invasion and in the process occupants of the house where assaulted, according to the natural and probable consequence doctrine, the abettor is guilty of home invasion, assault even though he/she was not physically involved in the assault.
Answer:
ummmm, I think it's A or D I'm leaning more towards D.
Explanation:
I've done this before but I don't remember, I think it's D very sorry if its not if it is pls mark brainliest
