Answer:
I dont know
Step-by-step explanation:
Ln(x) should be the answer
Answer:
14 is the simplified answer, but the whole answer is 17 + -18/6
Step-by-step explanation:
Divide
−
18 by 6. h (−18) = 17 − 3 Subtract 3 from 17. h (−18)= 14
The final answer is 14.
Answer:
60 minutes or 1 hour
Step-by-step explanation:
My picture is my worked out solution :)
Null hypothesis: There is no significant association between the existing process and the new process for reducing the population proportion of screens that will be rejected
.
Alternative hypothesis :There is a significant association between the existing process and the new process for reducing the population proportion of screens that will be rejected
.
Finally the null hypothesis will be rejected and we should accept the alternate hypothesis
Step-by-step explanation:
In the existing process the sample size and population was not known.,but the percentage of rejected screens were given as 12%.,but in the new process out of 100 screens only 6 are rejected
percentage of rejected screens using new process = 6÷ 100 ×100 = 6%
percentage of rejected screens using existing (old) process = 12%
so the new process is the effective one which reduces the rejection rate of screens., hence it is concluded that There is a significant association between the existing process and the new process for reducing the population proportion of screens that will be rejected
.
so the null hypothesis will be rejected and we should accept the alternate hypothesis
