Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
Answer:
What would make communication better would be if the had some sort of system to tell mass amounts of people what is happening, such as a speaker. It would communicate everything much easier and help!
Explanation:
Hope this helps! Please mark brainliest!
Answer:
I think that writing would be necessary for early people because they needed to communicate. Writing emerged in many early civilizations as a way to keep records and better manage money and other things, so it would be important for them to communicate so they could exchange information, like records or money.
The main reason was so that the country would attract investors and also that the country could borrow in the future
.
Alexander Hamilton was an American statesman who died in 1804, he was one of the pioneers of US. He led in the Federal government's financing of the states' obligations, and in addition building up a national bank, an arrangement of tariffs, and agreeable exchange relations with England.
<span>Catherine the Great and the Founding Fathers of the US both believed that there needed to be a body of laws to avoid chaos and to insure fairness.</span>
