Answer:
1. Invalid and weak
2. Invalid and strong.
Explanation:
The first argument does not present statements that support and justify it and for that reason, we can consider it a weak argument. In addition, the conclusion of the argument is not consistent with its premise, presenting a fallacy and causing wrong reasoning, which shows that the argument is invalid.
Similarly, the second argument has a conclusion that contradicts the information shown above, which invalidates the argument. However, the argument presents additional information that can support and justify it, for this reason, we can consider it a strong argument.
Answer – Political and legal institutions
In the ancient times, the responsibility to maintain and
foster societal order was solely a function of the family, but in modern times,
this responsibility has shifted to the government through the <span>political
(Executive and Legislature) and legal (Judiciary) institutions.</span>
Answer:
Absolute monarchy is closest in governance to being a dictatorship. The only difference is it's just a royal dictatorship. Like a dictatorship, an absolute monarchy has no checks and balances in the system. Second closest would be an oligarchy, where a small group of elites exert absolute power.
Explanation:
Make mine the Brainliest
Answer:
The answer is Intervening cause
Explanation:
Answer:
Ethnographic
Explanation:
Ethnography is a qualitative research that deals with the in-depth study of a culture or facet of culture. The observer in this type of research method also become a participant, he misses with the culture or people he/she intends to study so that he/she can have a detailed report about the subject of study.
