Answer:
A two-sided alternative hypothesis would be more appropriate in this case
Step-by-step explanation:
A one-sided hypothesis is one that asserts that a given parameter is either smaller than the null hypothesis value or larger than the value presented by the null hypothesis.
However in a two sided hypothesis, the claim is made that a given parameter is not equal to the parameter given in the null hypothesis, such that the parameter can be either larger than than or lesser than the value of the null hypothesis and still satisfy the condition of the hypothesis
Therefore, given for that for there to be a conclusion, the test should be weather the number of people that think of an odd number are equal to the number of people that think of an even number, or weather the number of people that think of an odd number are not equal to the number of people that think of an even number
Therefore, a two-sided hypothesis should be used since the claim (that the numbers are not equal) is not equal to the value of the parameter in the null hypothesis (that the numbers are equal)
8000 + 300 + 70 + 4 + 0.2 + 0.01
we have
we know that
see the graph
Let
<u>Find the slope BC</u>
The slope is positive
so
The graph is increasing in the interval----------> (10, ∞)
<u>Find the slope AB</u>
The slope is negative
so
The graph is decreasing in the interval----------> (-∞,10)
therefore
<u>the answer is the option</u>
D. (10, ∞)
9514 1404 393
Answer:
A, B, C, D, F . . . as written
Step-by-step explanation:
Any mixed number, fraction, or finite or repeating decimal is rational. The only one in your list that is irrational is E, which appears to be a non-repeating, non-terminating decimal.
__
Your B selection appears to be 11² = 121, an integer and a rational number.
If your B selection is supposed to be √11, then that number is irrational, as it is not the root of a perfect square.
E is irrational; B is rational as written, but irrational if it should be √11. All the others are rational.
Answer:
6
Hope you could get an idea from here.
Doubt clarification - use comment section.