Question

How does a scientist critique another scientist’s conclusion?

Answer 1

B just joking D? I think I have to make up my sentence to 20 letters that is why i am talking haha x

Answer 2

Answer:

The correct answer is D. By presenting data that contradicts those conclusions

Explanation:

Criticizing in science must be supported by data which validates the alternative conclusion. If a scientist want to demonstrate that another scientist is wrong about a conclusion- o that there are some aspects to improve- he or she has to present valid data and elaborate a new conclusion. It is like presenting evidence in a case.