moralist depends on moral values and norms. whereas formalist on the legal and official way
Hi, this is the answer .
Tina's best food is daal bhat, <u>isn't </u><u>it?</u>
<em><u>Why </u></em><em><u>do </u></em><em><u>we </u></em><em><u>use </u></em><em><u>"</u></em><em><u> </u></em><u>isn't </u><u>it"</u><u>?</u>
<u>We </u><u>use </u><u>"</u><u> </u><u>isn't </u><u>it"</u><u> </u><u>because </u><u>when </u><u>we </u><u>write </u><u>question</u><u> </u><u>tags,</u><u> </u><u>we </u><u>should </u><u>check </u><u>for </u><u>words </u><u>like </u><u>is,</u><u> </u><u>was,</u><u> </u><u>do,</u><u> </u><u>will </u><u>etc.</u>
Below are some question tags, left side are the words, right side are the converted question tags form.
is - isn't
was - wasn't
do - doesn't
will - won't
<h2>
Note-</h2><h3>We write it, he, she , they etc. according to the given sentence.</h3>
Hope it helps you. pls mark brainliest if it helped you
The all flew 8 yards, so we can eliminate that for now.
1/2 - Sara - 6/12
2/3 - Jason - 8/12
1/4 - Michael - 3/12
1/6 - Denise - 2/12
Common denominator: 12
Jason's plane flew the farthest as his numerator is the largest (after we found a common denominator for all 4 fractions).
Answer:
- Trust; persuasiveness.
Explanation:
Contradictory information is also known as 'counterclaims' that serve to propose the rebuttal or denial to the original/central claim of the speech. However, it seems strange as there is a fear that it might go against the validity of the central argument of the work but the chief aim is to build the listeners' 'trust' that the author presents an objective claim(by analyzing both the perspectives). This leads to enhance the credibility of the claim and improve the 'persuasiveness' of the speech that would assist in convincing the audience more effectively. Therefore, 'counterclaims' are deliberately employed by the authors to uplift the reliability of their speech which is negated by sufficient evidence to establish the validity of central argument/claim.
