He wanted to be the first of the manhunters to tell Stanton that Booth had been found and killed. He also hoped to procede the rest of the cavalry and stake the first claim to the reward money.
Learned behavior is less prone to extinction if it is conditioned by partial reinforcement.
Only a portion of the time is spent reinforcing the answer, in partial (or intermittent) reinforcement. With partial reinforcement, learned behaviors are learned more slowly but are more resistant to extinction.
Partial schedules, as opposed to continuous schedules, promote the desired behavior only on occasion. Because it takes longer to initially link behavior to reinforcement, learning progresses more slowly as a result.
Partial schedules, however, also result in behavior that is more resistant to being eliminated. Organisms are tempted to continue acting in a certain way in the hopes of receiving rewards in the future.
To learn more about partial reinforcement, click
brainly.com/question/9408518
#SPJ4
Answer:
Correct answer is C. The melting snow from the mountains created headwaters for both rivers.
Explanation:
Option C is correct as Himalayas are surrounding the China and as high mountains are providing headwater for two of the largest rivers in Asia, which are foundation of the Chinese civilization.
All other options are not correct as they are not impacting Chinese rivers in that manner.
Answer:
Experimenter, participant
Explanation:
Experimenter expectancy effects can be described or considered as an error in the scientific findings or inquiries, where the researchers' expectations concerning their enquiries or findings are made known unconsciously to the subjects or participant, and this will automatically influence their responses.
This is also known as the object expectancy effect.
The subject or participant expectancy effect occurs when the result being expected by the participants or subjects unconsciously affect the expected result.
It should be noted that the experimental expectancy effect can be prevented by double-blind design. Double-blind design is a situation where both the experimenter and the participant do not know the subject identity.
The participant expectancy effect can be prevented by a single-blind design, where the subject is not aware if he/she is the experimental test object.
