Like the person below:
Organizers would make use of social media, such as Facebook, to organize and unify.
<span>Reformers would not have demanded change because British and French economies are more stable.
</span>
It is not the second or the last one because
the British and french government would have allowed them to be indepedent long time ago, as they were allowing their colonies to have self-rule.
More people around the world would have been aware because of the internet, news, etc.
hope this helps
Answer:
Explanation:
OC
It was able to convince France washington could win the war
Well, one big benefit would more than likely be that if you have a strike and you go on for a long time and stop working your boss is going to give you what you want. They may not give you everything but they will more than likely give you most of your demands. But one big danger would be facing the fact of being fired. If you don't work and you go on strike you could be facing the fact of being fired. With this being said I personally think that this isn't a solution that people should go to because it can be dangerous because it can lead to death or the loss of a job.
I hope this helps!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please mark me as Brainiest
Answer:
Explanation:
In terms of global trends of the 1st century CE, one conclusion that could be drawn from the map above would be A. the empires of the world fought one another for control of trade routes. ... the Han Empire had the most material wealth of all empires of the time period.
Authoritarian monarchy.
"Old" oligarchy.
"New" oligarchy.
Semicompetitive authoritarianism.
Socialist authoritarianism
Military regimes.