What type of math are you doing in middle school that sh!+
is hard...
The best answer from the options that proves that the residual plot shows that the line of best fit is appropriate for the data is: ( Statement 1 ) Yes, because the points have no clear pattern
X Given Predicted Residual value
1 3.5 4.06 -0.56
2 2.3 2.09 0.21
3 1.1 0.12 0.98
4 2.2 -1.85 4.05
5 -4.1 -3.82 -0.28
The residual value is calculated as follows using this formula: ( Given - predicted )
1) ( 3.5 - 4.06 ) = -0.56
2) ( 2.3 - 2.09 ) = 0.21
3) ( 1.1 - 0.12 ) = 0.98
4) (2.2 - (-1.85) = 4.05
5) ( -4.1 - (-3.82) = -0.28
Residual values are the difference between the given values and the predicted values in a given data set and the residual plot is used to represent these values .
attached below is the residual plot of the data set
hence we can conclude from the residual plot attached below that the line of best fit is appropriate for the data because the points have no clear pattern ( i.e. scattered )
learn more about residual plots : brainly.com/question/16821224
Answer:
the savings is 6000
Step-by-step explanation:
We are told that the ratio of savings to expenditure is 2: 8, that is, that person saves 2 when he spends 8.
They tell us to find the savings when the cost is 24,000, so we are left with:
24000 * 2/8 = 6000
which means that when 24000 are spent the savings is 6000
Answer:
- JK = 6.5
- KM = 5.5
- not congruent
Step-by-step explanation:
JK = K-J = (-4) -(-10.5) = 6.5
KM = M -K = 1.5 -(-4) = 5.5
6.5 ≠ 5.5, so the segments are not congruent.