Answer:
B) Businesses can actually do very little in terms of social responsibility.
Explanation:
Milton Friedman is most famous for the defense of the Chicago School economics which is a neoclassical approach to macroeconomics. He favored free trade, smaller government and a slow but constant growth of the money supply. I personally disagree with neoclassical economists because they have the tendency to mess things up and time proves they are always wrong (that is a biased but positive statement). He was the father of monetarism, but if you look at his last two disciples, George Bush and George W. Bush, the outcome was not positive ⇒ 3 deep recessions in 3 presidential terms.
As a neoclassical economist, Friedman believed and argued in favor of the trickle down in economics. That means that if you allow the rich to get overwhelmingly rich, their riches will spill over to the rest of society. Not because they are good people that like to share their wealth, but because they need workers and employees to keep consuming goods and services in order to get the economy moving. Eventually the spilled over wealth should return to the top. So it is no wonder why he opposed corporate social responsibility, since wasting time and money in the community, employees or the environment was simply a waste of resources that could be used to increase stockholders' wealth.
I understand how theoretically this might work, but it takes the human factor out of the equation and expectations are extremely important in economics, that is why they always fail.
Answer: a. Economic factors
Explanation:
Company orientation refers to training that is given to new employees to better prepare them to work in the company and be as efficient as possible.
It includes things like occupational health and safety so that the employee may know how best to behave so as not to cause accident or get injured by one. It also includes telling the employees of the various fringe benefits that might accrue to them.
It would not include economic factors as these as not specific to the company.
Answer:
19.05%
Explanation:
the approximate yield to maturity (YTM) formula is:
approximate YTM = {C + [(FV - PV) / n]} / [(FV + PV) / 2]
- C = coupon payment = $130
- FV = face value or value at maturity = $1,000
- PV = present value or current market value = $690
- n = 10 years
approximate YTM = {$130 + [($1,000 - $690) / 10]} / [($1,000 + $690) / 2] = ($130 + $31) / $845 = $161 / $845 = 0.1905 or 19.05%
John's assumptions in making this decision are that the three new product engineers are not capable writers and that their writing is terrible. John also believes that the only way the technical manual can be brought up to company standards is by offering a course in technical writing.
This is not an appropriate strategy for resolving the issue, as decisions should never be made based solely on assumptions, such as the fact that the product engineers in question are new hires and therefore unable to write. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a decision?</h3>
Generally, a decision or conclusion was arrived at after careful deliberation.
In conclusion, When John was making this choice, he made a number of assumptions, one of which was that the three new product engineers are not competent writers and that their writing is horrible. John is also of the opinion that the only way the firm's technical handbook can be brought up to the standards of the corporation is by providing students with the opportunity to take a course in technical writing.
Because choices should never be made entirely based on assumptions, such as the fact that the product engineers in question are new employees and hence unable to write, this is not a suitable technique for fixing the problem. Decisions should never be made solely based on assumptions.
Read more about a decision
brainly.com/question/27400967
#SPJ1
The answer would be A. Shoes.
It is implied that a good has an inelastic supply if the supplier does not have a choice other than producing it despite the change in production cost. This would as well apply to the buyer, who needs the product no matter the pricing.No one can live without shoes, despite a spike in prices, we still need to buy them.
