<u>Explanation</u>:
This is an example of a linear programming problem.
THE CONSTRAINTS
Let d, c represents number of desk and chair.
Marketing restrictions
c ≥ 2d; which can be written as
2d - c ≤0
Wood restriction
4d + 3c ≤ 20
OBJECTIVE FUCTION (MAX)
= 40d + 25c
Where d ≥ 0, c ≥ 0
With this details you can then find the solutions either graphically or using any other linear programming solution methods.
Answer:
a. From a political perspective, Ricoh should be aware of regulations from ITAC (Information Technology Association of Canada) who is actively promoting and supporting the expansion of the IT services industry in Canada as this move will likely impact Ricoh in many ways. - Yes
b. From an economic perspective, Canada enjoys a strong economy with a strong GDP growth. - Yes
c. Low oil prices are causing turmoil in business investment in western Canada, leading to a negative impact for the economic component of the macro-environment. - Yes
d. A weak Canadian dollar makes the cost of importing more expensive. - No
Explanation:
- The macroeconomic conditions that impact the business in terms of the economic growth rate. The use of GNP and GDP to measure the growth. The macroeconomic phenomenon estates the patterns and conditions from the large aspects of the economy.
Answer and Explanation:
The journal entry to record the given transaction is as follows
Retained earning Dr (0.30 million × $54) $16.2 million
To Common stock (0.30 million × $1) $0.3 million
To Additional paid in capital in excess of par (0.30 million × $53) $15.9 million
(Being the stock dividend is declared)
The computation of the shares after declaring the dividend is
= 30 million × 1%
= 0.30 million
Answer:
advanced education
Explanation:
just got it right on edge 2020
Answer:
The change in the dollar amount of inventory is $200 due to change in the inventory costing method.
Explanation:
The variable cost per unit is $6.00 while the fixed cost per unit is $2.00
Variable cost per unit = $6.00
Absorption cost pet units = $8.00
Total cost under absorption costing = Absorption cost per unit / number of units in ending inventory
Total absorption cost = $8.00 × 100 = $800
Total cost under variable cost = Variable cost per unit × number of units in ending inventory
Total variable cost = $6.00 × 100 = $600
Change in cost = Total absorption cost - Total variable cost
Change in cost = $800 - $600 = $200
