Answer:
The answers are Horizontal and Vertical respectively.
Explanation:
Horizontal integration refers to the expansion strategy adopted by the corporations which involves acquisition of one company by another company where both the companies are in the same business line and at same value chain supply level, whereas, Vertical integration refers to the expansion strategy adopted by the corporations where one company acquire another company who is at the different level, usually at the lower level of its value chain supply process.
Answer:
The correct answer is option d.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage refers to the situation where an individual, firm or nation can produce a good at a relatively lower cost than its competitors.
Luke can bake bread at a relatively lower opportunity cost while Jason can produce paintings at a relatively lower opportunity cost.
This implies that Luke has a comparative advantage in baking bread and Jason has a comparative advantage in making paintings.
Luke specializes in baking bread and Jason specializes in making paintings.
Sam West wal-mart de mexico asda stores and walmart japan holdings
Answer:
the depreciation expense that should be recorded for the second year is $27,375
Explanation:
The computation of the amount of depreciation expense that should be recorded for the second year is shown below
Depreciation rate is
= ($198,250 - $10,500) ÷ 751000
= 0.25 per bolt
Now Depreciation expense for the second year
= $109,500 × .25
= $27,375
hence, the depreciation expense that should be recorded for the second year is $27,375
The only action that cannot be take is the corporation can file a lawsuit against her.
c. the corporation can file a lawsuit against her.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Here Arianna cannot file a lawsuit against the compnay because the company is not at fault but Arianna is. She committed an Ultra Vires act and hence cannot file a lawsuit against the company for a reimbursement. The company didn't had any idea about her actions and she didn't inform.
The key is to have the documentation demonstrating the individual was liable for the damage or harms that happened. Along these lines, truly, you can truly sue for about any explanation if your case meets the best possible criteria.
