First there is a need to calculate the molar mass of Ba(NO₃)₂:
137.3 + 2 (14.0) + 6 (16) = 261.3 grams/mole
The molar mass, denoted by M in chemistry refers to a physical characteristic illustrated as the mass of a given component divided by the amount of the component. The molar masses are always denoted in grams/mole.
After finding the molar mass, the number of moles can be identified as:
432 grams / 261.3 g/mol = 1.65 moles of Ba(NO₃)₂.
Answer:
When ΔS > ΔH/ T, then the reaction will proceed forward
Explanation:
- The entity that determines the whether a reaction will occur on its own in the forward direction (Spontaneity or Feasibility) is Gibb's free energy.
- Gibb's free energy is the energy available to do work. It is denoted as 'G'. It cannot be easily measured. The change (ΔG) can only be measured. ΔG = ΔH - TΔS
when ΔG is positive, The reaction is not spontaneous (reaction will not occur on its own)
When ΔG is negative, The reaction is spontaneous (reaction will occur on its own)
When ΔG is zero, the reaction is in equilibrium
Option A and E are not correct. ΔH (Enthalpy) cannot determine spontaneity
Option C and D cannot alone determine spontaneity of reaction
For reaction to be spontaneous, TΔS > ΔH
Therefore, ΔS > ΔH/T
Answer: The gravitational pull on Moon B is greater than on Moon A because Moon B is closer to the new planet than Moon A.
Explanation:
The gravitational force exerted by the two objects on each other is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the objects.
F = gravitational force or pull
G = gravitational constant on that planet
M = mass of the object-1
m = mass of object-2(Mass of Moon-A or Moon-B)
r = distance between two objects
With decease in distance 'r' the force between the object increases or vice versa.So, from this we can say that the gravitational pull on Moon-B is more than the gravitational pull on Moon-A because the Moon B is closer than the Moon-A from the new planet.
Answer:
Your hypothesis is an educated guess of what the end results of an experiment will be, using what you already know about your experiment you are going to conduct. So when you receive your final results, if your hypothesis is correct, or even somewhat correct then you know that it is supported by your results. For example, if I were to conduct the Coca-Cola and Mentos experiment, I could make a hypothesis that the Coca-Cola will have a bigger eruption when I add more than one Mento to the bottle due to a higher amount of a chemical with the addition of each mento. When I receive my results that the eruption was bigger each time, I know that my results supported my hypothesis.
Explanation:
-Hope this helped
