All categories

3 years ago

Seriously can any1 help me

Mathematics

1 answer:

zhuklara [117]3 years ago

4 0

1)
Reasons:
- Given
- Alternate Exterior
- Alternate Interior
- Substitution

2) Reasons
-Given
- Linear Pair
- Alternate Interior
- Substitution

You might be interested in

Which measurement statement is correct

olasank [31]

C would be your answer but if you search up math review click photos and itll be a miracle to you

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the inverse function of d(x) = 2x - 4?

Naddik [55]

Let d(x) = 2x - 4

Or

y = 2x - 4

We have replace x = y

x = 2y - 4

Now Isolate "y"

x + 4 = 2y

Pass "2" dividing

(x + 4) / 2 = y

y = x/2 + 2

Or

d(x)^-1 = x/2 + 2

7 0

3 years ago

In 1 and 2, use the table below that shows information about squares.

frutty [35]

1. The table has a constant of proportionality of 4, therefore, the perimeter and side length of squares are proportional.

2. Equation for the proportion is, y = 4x.

Perimeter = 48 cm.

<h3>What is the Equation of a Proportional Relationship?</h3>

The equation that defines a proportional relationship is, y = kx, where k is the constant of proportionality between variables x and y.

1. For the table given:

y = perimeter

x = side length

k = constant of proportionality = 8/2 = 16/4 = 24/6 = 4.

Since k is the same all through, the equation can be modelled as y = 4x, which means the perimeter and side length of squares are proportional.

2. Using the equation, y = 4x,the perimeter (y) of a square when its side length is 12 (x) is:

y = 4(12)

y = 48 cm.

The perimeter (y) of the square is: 48 cm.

Learn more about proportional relationship on:

brainly.com/question/15618632

#SPJ1

3 0

2 years ago

PLEASE I REALLY NEED HELP!!! DUE SOON

maria [59]

Answer:

69.08

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A group of researchers are interested in the possible effects of distracting stimuli during eating, such as an increase or decre

Dmitry [639]

Using the t-distribution, it is found that since the p-value of the test is of 0.0302, which is less than the standard significance level of 0.05, the data provides convincing evidence that the average food intake is different for the patients in the treatment group.

At the null hypothesis, it is tested if the consumption is not different, that is, if the subtraction of the means is 0, hence:

$H_0: \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0$

At the alternative hypothesis, it is tested if the consumption is different, that is, if the subtraction of the means is not 0, hence:

$H_1: \mu_1 - \mu_2 \neq 0$

Two groups of 22 patients, hence, the standard errors are:

$s_1 = \frac{45.1}{\sqrt{22}} = 9.6154$

$s_2 = \frac{26.4}{\sqrt{22}} = 5.6285$

The distribution of the differences is has:

$\overline{x} = \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 52.1 - 27.1 = 25$

$s = \sqrt{s_1^2 + s_2^2} = \sqrt{9.6154^2 + 5.6285^2} = 11.14$

The test statistic is given by:

$t = \frac{\overline{x} - \mu}{s}$

In which $\mu = 0$ is the value tested at the null hypothesis.

Hence:

$t = \frac{25 - 0}{11.14}$

$t = 2.2438$

The p-value of the test is found using a two-tailed test, as we are testing if the mean is different of a value, with t = 2.2438 and 22 + 22 - 2 = 42 df.

Using a t-distribution calculator, this p-value is of 0.0302.

Since the p-value of the test is of 0.0302, which is less than the standard significance level of 0.05, the data provides convincing evidence that the average food intake is different for the patients in the treatment group.

A similar problem is given at brainly.com/question/25600813

4 0

3 years ago