The outcome would probably be that people that did serious harm wouldn’t get a punishment for their actions where as innocent people would get a punishment without a second thought.
Answer:
unethical
1. because everyone should be treated the same as the other.
2. because it is wrong to persuade the prosecutor even if they are friends or not.
3.if the client has done something wrong then he should be treated nicer he should be treated normally as everyone else even if the lawyer is friends with the prosecutor
Explanation:
Answer:
Well I think that they are good people. Unless you're talking about the ones who explode.
Explanation:
Hazirah can legally claim the remaining balance of Intan's debt because there was no acceptance of the offer from Johan that the part-payment should serve as full settlement.
<h3>What is the law of contract?</h3>
The law of contract deals with the enforcement of promises when certain elements are present. These contract elements include offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention.
Intan should remember that a valid and enforceable contract has conditions. We cannot claim there is an implied acceptance of Johan's offer. Johan cannot modify the contract terms between Intan and Hazirah because he was not a party to the contract.
Lastly, Johan did not offer any consideration for Hazirah to forfeit the balance of RM5,000. And Hazirah remained silent during Johan's informal negotiations without communicating her acceptance.
Thus, there was <u>no </u><u>contract</u><u> </u>between Johan and Hazirah, and Intan should do well to repay the balance.
Learn more about the elements of a contract at brainly.com/question/8116487
