When reading this excerpt I understood authors intentions, I bet, in full measure. As he mentioned - the war is murder, thousands of people fighting for particular idea and nothing can't stop them, neither moral issues nor ethical rules. All these people are guilties of a global crime and author at any price will not support such events. Unlikely that all of these people will be punished for their mistakes or sins they have made, but if we will talk about regular crime, such as author described in the text - this actions must be sentenced to justice.
So I choose this option :
<span>B.Paine says that war is terrible, and ordinarily nothing could have convinced him to support it. However, he also believes that if a person or group commits severe crimes against him, that party should be punished, no matter who they are.</span>
Answer:
Intimacy is a term that, despite its widespread use, remains relatively ambiguous” (Hirschberger, Florian, & Mikulincer, 2003, p. 676). This sentence underlines the difficulty to define and to measure family intimacy. Indeed, measuring family intimacy involves taking into account both several dimensions of the construct and different levels of analysis. In the literature, several definitions of intimacy have been provided (Erikson, 1963; Reis & Shaver, 1988). Often intimacy is defined using terms as cohesion, closeness, support, trust, self-disclosure, responsiveness, presence, interdependence, and positivity (Foley & Duck, 2006). Beside the subdimensions of the construct, intimacy could be also conceptualized referring to individual, interactional, relational, or family level. Regarding the individual level, it is conceptualized as personal willingness to be in a supportive and affective relationship
Explanation:
Answer:
D. I think Kayla and Lily will run as they had planned because they have established a routine.
Explanation:
There is no strange change of occurrences that would make her change her routine. Her friend is just tying her shoelaces, so they will probably go out to run.
