All categories

3 years ago

What is the answer to this question

Mathematics

1 answer:

il63 [147K]3 years ago

6 0

The ratio of the shortest sides is 12/5. Multiplying the other two sides of the smaller triangle by that ratio gives 15 and 18, so the ratios of all sides are the same. The triangles are similar.

ABC ~ ZYX

The largest/smallest scale factor is 12/5 = 2.4.

You might be interested in

70%70, percent of a number is what fraction of that number?

lesantik [10]

Hello there!

A number that is 70% of a number is 7/10 of that number in fraction form!

I hope this was helpful and have a great rest of your day!

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following shapes describes the 2d figure formed by slicing parallel to the base of a triangular prism

Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

c. square.

Step-by-step explanation:

squares have 4 parallel sides so if you cut it in half you will still be parallel

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How much water do you need to add to make each concentration?<br> 1% sugar syrup using 12 g sugar

yulyashka [42]

Answer:

1188 grams of water

Step-by-step explanation:

x is the grams of water

so total is 12+x grams

sugar/total is 12/12+x

and 1% ratio is 12/12+x=1/100

so x would be 1188 grams of water.

6 0

3 years ago

Please answer asap.........

iren [92.7K]

Answer:

1.4 i would wait for someone else to answer it I'm not sure

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Toxaphene is an insecticide that has been identified as a pollutant in the Great Lakes ecosystem. To investigate the effect of t

Likurg_2 [28]

Answer:

This data suggest that there is more variability in low-dose weight gains than in control weight gains.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let $\sigma_{1}^{2}$ be the variance for the population of weight gains for rats given a low dose, and $\sigma_{2}^{2}$ the variance for the population of weight gains for control rats whose diet did not include the insecticide.

We want to test $H_{0}: \sigma_{1}^{2} = \sigma_{2}^{2}$ vs $H_{1}: \sigma_{1}^{2} > \sigma_{2}^{2}$ . We have that the sample standard deviation for $n_{2} = 22$ female control rats was $s_{2} = 28$ g and for $n_{1} = 18$ female low-dose rats was $s_{1} = 51$ g. So, we have observed the value

$F = \frac{s_{1}^{2}}{s_{2}^{2}} = \frac{(51)^{2}}{(28)^{2}} = 3.3176$ which comes from a F distribution with $n_{1} - 1 = 18 - 1 = 17$ degrees of freedom (numerator) and $n_{2} - 1 = 22 - 1 = 21$ degrees of freedom (denominator).

As we want carry out a test of hypothesis at the significance level of 0.05, we should find the 95th quantile of the F distribution with 17 and 21 degrees of freedom, this value is 2.1389. The rejection region is given by {F > 2.1389}, because the observed value is 3.3176 > 2.1389, we reject the null hypothesis. So, this data suggest that there is more variability in low-dose weight gains than in control weight gains.

8 0

3 years ago