If a new body of evidence were found that directly contradicted the cell theory, groups of scientists would then _________ ?

2 answers:

8 0

Answer: The correct answer for the fill in the blank is - group of scientists would then revise the theory either by excluding the rules, which are not fulfilled by all life forms or they will make editions in the existing rule by putting the exceptions of those life forms.

Thus, if evidences from new body contradicts the cell theory, scientists would revise the theory.

Greeley [361]3 years ago

3 0

Hello,

If a new body of evidence were found that directly contradicted the cell theory, groups of scientists would then start formulating new theories.

You might be interested in

What happens if a cell fails its

Olin [163]

The cell continues to divide

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is all of the chemical processes cells undergo

KengaRu [80]

Cellular respiration is the process by which the chemical energy of "food" molecules is released and partially captured in the form of ATP. ... In glycolysis, the 6-carbon sugar, glucose, is broken down into two molecules of a 3-carbon molecule called pyruvate.

3 0

2 years ago

Which statement identifies an example of a genetic factor that could influence the growth or development of an organism created

qaws [65]

Answer:

fertilizer creating a mutation among a farmer's crops

Explanation:

A genetic factor is one that affects the gene or genome of an individual organism. This genetic factor often influences the observable trait called PHENOTYPE of the organism. In this case, an example of a genetic factor that could influence the growth or development of an organism created by an environmental factor is the "fertilizer creating a mutation among a farmer's crops"

The fertilizer represents the environmental/chemical factor which is creating the genetic factor (mutation) that will eventually influence the growth or development of the crops.

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is an inference instead of an observation? Please answer correctly and show how it's correct maybe

SashulF [63]

Answer:

Explanation:

A, B, and C, are all observing the situations, while D states the deer walked down the path earlier because of the tracks, this is hardly obersavable, and you would have to infere the deer took the path early.

8 0

3 years ago

Please help me answer this its for a module 7 biology review

GREYUIT [131]

1. the theory that Earth's outer shell is divided into several plates that glide over the mantle
2. I am not sure
3. Earth's mantle contained convection cells that dissipated radioactive heat and moved the crust at the surface
4. supercontinent that existed during the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic eras.
5. the theory that the outer rigid layer of the earth (the lithosphere) is divided into a couple of dozen "plates" that move around across the earth's surface relative to each other, like slabs of ice on a lake.
6. Africa and South America.
7. I am not sure
8. a small area or region with a relatively hot temperature in comparison to its surroundings.
9. As the plate moves over a fixed spot deeper in the Earth where magma (molten lava) forms, a new volcano can punch through this plate and create an island. The Hawaiian Islands are believed to be formed from one such 'hot spot'.

8 0

2 years ago