Answer:
Growth becomes pale and development far from the environment.
Explanation:
For there to be any form of development in a society or residents, there has to be an allowable form of freedom from some evil practices. An example is security. No business can thrive in an environment that is not secure, this would make investors take their money elsewhere to a safer location, than build their business there and burglars come to attack it or prevent it's client from operating freely in the location the business was planted. Another example is unfair consideration of cost of items which are sold, especially of the cost of the product or service is way more over the quality of the product or service, this would hinder growth of the society, as individuals residing won't enjoy the extortion they are being made to pay from.
<em><u>Hope</u></em><em><u> this</u></em><em><u> helps</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
I think it's ashikaga period sorry if am wrong
The location of the water resources affect the settlement in Iran, Turkey, and Cyprus because the water that they have is not fresh so they can not drink it. Also they have to walk far because they are far away from a water source.
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
In democracy, the opponent includes one or even more national or regional parties or other formed organisations that are objected in the political power of a area, province, state, nation or even other political institution, primarily politically, to the administration, faction, or community.Opposition party works as one the major pillars for democracies.
Federal government came into existence after the concept of democracy and democracy can only be achieved when people have the alternative to choose their representative.
Answer:
b. counterclaim
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Ava's claim is known as a counter claim. This term refers to a claim made in order to prove that a previous claim made against you is false. In this case Daniel made a claim against Ava, and Ava is rebutting that claim by stating that Daniel breached the contract, therefore making his claim void.
