Answer:
a) The probability that the airline will lose no bags next monday is 0.1108
b) The probability that the airline will lose 0,1, or 2 bags next Monday is 0.6227
c) I would recommend taking a Poisson model with mean 4.4 instead of a Poisson model with mean 2.2
Step-by-step explanation:
The probability mass function of X, for which we denote the amount of bags lost next monday is given by this formula
a)
The probability that the airline will lose no bags next monday is 0.1108.
b) Note that 
. And
Therefore, the probability that the airline will lose 0,1, or 2 bags next Monday is 0.6227.
c) If the double of flights are taken, then you at least should expect to loose a similar proportion in bags, because you will have more chances for a bag to be lost. WIth this in mind, we can correctly think that the average amount of bags that will be lost each day will double. Thus, i would double the mean of the Poisson model, in other words, i would take a Poisson model with mean 4.4, instead of 2.2.
Answer:
0 hope it helps ok bye have a good grade
9514 1404 393
Answer:
-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3
Step-by-step explanation:
This inequality can be resolved to a compound inequality:
-7 ≤ (3x -5)/2 ≤ 7
Multiply all parts by 2.
-14 ≤ 3x -5 ≤ 14
Add 5 to all parts.
-9 ≤ 3x ≤ 19
Divide all parts by 3.
-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
If you subtract 7 from both sides of the given inequality, it becomes ...
|(3x -5)/2| -7 ≤ 0
Then you're looking for the values of x that bound the region where the graph is below the x-axis. Those are shown in the attachment. For graphing purposes, I find this comparison to zero works well.
__
For an algebraic solution, I like the compound inequality method shown above. That only works well when the inequality is of the form ...
|f(x)| < (some number) . . . . or ≤
If the inequality symbol points away from the absolute value expression, or if the (some number) expression involves the variable, then it is probably better to write the inequality in two parts with appropriate domain specifications:
|f(x)| > g(x) ⇒ f(x) > g(x) for f(x) > 0; or -f(x) > g(x) for f(x) < 0
Any solutions to these inequalities must respect their domains.
Answer: i think its either 3:5 or 1:3 or there just not similar
Step-by-step explanation:
This would be 5^2 because you have to subtract the exponents.
