1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Jobisdone [24]
3 years ago
5

Economics help please thank you useful answers only please

History
1 answer:
melomori [17]3 years ago
4 0
The answer is distribution because it refers to the way total output, income, or wealth is distributed among individuals or among the factors of production.
You might be interested in
How would you describe the life in the court of suleiman the magnificent court
DochEvi [55]
The Europeans called him "The Magnificent," but the Ottomans called him Kanuni, or "The Lawgiver." The Suleymanie Mosque, built for Suleyman, describes Suleyman in its inscription as Nashiru kawanin al-Sultaniyye , or "Propagator of the Sultanic Laws." The primacy of Suleyman as a law-giver is at the foundation of his place in Islamic history and world view. It is perhaps important to step back a moment and closely examine this title to fully understand Suleyman's place in history.

The word used for law here, kanun, has a very specific reference. In Islamic tradition, the Shari'ah, or laws originally derived from the Qur'an , are meant to be universally applied across all Islamic states. No Islamic ruler has the power to overturn or replace these laws. So what laws was Suleyman "giving" to the Islamic world? What precisely does kanun refer to since it doesn't refer to the main body of Islamic law, the Shari'ah ?

The kanun refer to situational decisions that are not covered by the Shari'ah . Even though the Shari'ah provides all necessary laws, it's recognized that some situations fall outside their parameters. In Islamic tradition, if a case fell outside the parameters of the Shari'ah , then a judgement or rule in the case could be arrived at through analogy with rules or cases that are covered by the Shari'ah . This method of juridical thinking was only accepted by the most liberal school of Shari'ah , Hanifism, so it is no surprise that Hanifism dominated Ottoman law.

The Ottomans, however, elevated kanun into an entire code of laws independent of the Shari'ah. The first two centuries of Ottoman rule, from 1350 to 1550, saw an explosion of kanun rulings and laws, so that by the beginning of the sixteenth century, the kanun were a complete and independent set of laws that by and large were more important than the Shari'ah . This unique situation was brought about in part because of the unique heritage of the Ottomans. In both Turkish and Mongol traditions, the imperial law, or law pronounced by the monarch, was considered sacred. They even had a special word for it: the Turks called it Türe and the Mongols called it Yasa . In the system of Türe and Yasa , imperial law was regarded as the essential and sacred foundation of the empire. When this tradition collided with the Islamic Shari'ah tradition, a compromised system combining both was formed.

The Sultanic laws were first collected together by Mehmed the Conqueror. Mehmed divided the kanun into two separate sets or laws. The first set dealt with the organization of government and the military, and the second set dealt with the taxation and treatment of the peasantry. The latter group was added to after the death of Mehmed and the Ottoman kanun pretty much crystallized into its final form in 1501. Suleyman, for his part, revised the law code, but on the whole the Suleyman code of laws is pretty identical to the 1501 system of laws. However, it was under Suleyman that the laws took their final form; no more revisions were made after his reign. From this point onwards, this code of laws was called, kanun-i 'Osmani , or the "Ottoman laws."

Hope this helps
4 0
2 years ago
PLEASE HELP
Dafna11 [192]

Answer:

striker

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What was the Trail of Tears? How do you think this affected the Cherokee people, in both the short-term and long-term?
jeka57 [31]

Answer:

Well lots of people died during the trail of tears and so that would affect them mentally. I'm not sure about long term.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What were the benefits of the middle passage
OleMash [197]
What was the Passage about? Where is the Passage?
8 0
3 years ago
Why was ending all trade with Britain and Ireland in the First Continental Congress a good thing?
yulyashka [42]

Answer: What inference can you draw from why the First Continental Congress cut off trade with Britain and Ireland? Colonial leaders thought a boycott against British trade would be effective. The colonists had realized that they might have to fight British soldiers.

Explanation: Hope it helps :)

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why does Truman feel the act is radical and not "moderate"
    6·1 answer
  • What are the four factors that affect the business cycle and how does each factor
    11·1 answer
  • What was significant about the defeat of Japan in the Battle of Iwo Jima?
    9·1 answer
  • Congressman Allan Derulo was elected as a representative to a state’s 41st district in November of 2010. If he wishes to serve a
    12·1 answer
  • When did Queen Elizabeth die?
    13·2 answers
  • John f Kennedy missle crisis
    12·1 answer
  • 18, WHICH IS PART OF A SOCIETY'S CULTURE?<br> A. ART B. LITERATURE C. RELIGION D. ALL OF THESE
    15·1 answer
  • Please help ASAPpppppp
    11·1 answer
  • What was the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Bush v. Gore, and what was the basis for its decision?
    10·2 answers
  • In the 1800s, factories hired more women and children than they had in the past because
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!