Answer:
Explanation:The All-Africa Peoples Conference was conceived to represent the position that Africa should be returned to the peoples and groups, such as ethnic communities, from who it was grabbed by colonialism. The idea was mooted in Accra, Ghana, in April 1958 by John Kale from Uganda.
Answer:
The option which weaken the conclusion drawn is:
E. All artists who receive grants and donations are completely dependent on that money to cover their daily expenses; without those funds, they would have to discontinue the practice of their art.
Explanation:
The conclusion drawn in the passage is that grants and donations are a bad things because they actually make artists lose the interest for work. The passage claims that artists only practice art because they need to survive.
<u>The option that weakens that conclusion is the one that goes against it. In that case, we should choose letter E, since it claims the opposite. It states that artists need the money they receive in the form of grants and donations. If they cannot cover their expenses, they cannot work. If grants and donations help them cove their expenses, they are able to work. Therefore, letter E is the best option.</u>
Skewed understanding involves the degree to which the biases inherent in the discipline’s perspective is reflected, therefore the way an author understands the issue that resulted from the author’s intentional decision or unconscious predisposition to exclude specific information that refers to the issue.
Skewed understanding is the distorted understanding of an issue in a way that it is regarded as inaccurate or misleading.
Explanation:
there are a number of core ethical principles that are the subject of widespread consensus: principles relating to honesty, the keeping of promises, the avoidance of harm, the provision of aid to those in need, respect for human rights and dignity, and ideas about fairness and equality.
Answer:
d. Internal coherence demonstrates the rational relationship between parts of a hypothesis.
Explanation:
The<u> statement "d" best describes the internal coherence of a hypothesis </u>because if the different parts of a hypothesis aren't coherent with each other, aren't related, there's no internal coherence in the first place. All the different parts have to have a rational relationship, have to be rational with each other.
