Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We will use 2 coordinates from the table along with the standard form for an exponential function to write the equation that models that data. The standard form for an exponential function is
where x and y are coordinates from the table, a is the initial value, and b is the growth/decay rate. I will use the first 2 coordinates from the table: (0, 3) and (1, 1.5)
Solving first for a:
. Sine anything in the world raised to a power of 0 is 1, we can determine that
a = 3. Using that value along with the x and y from the second coordinate I chose, I can then solve for b:
. Since b to the first is just b:
1.5 = 3b so
b = .5
Filling in our model:

Since the value for b is greater than 0 but less than 1 (in other words a fraction smaller than 1), this table represents a decay function.
Answer:
see explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
(a)
Sum the parts of the ratio , 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 parts
Divide sum of angles in a triangle by 6 to find the value of one part of the ratio.
180° ÷ 6 = 30° ← value of 1 part of the ratio
2 parts = 2 × 30° = 60°
3 parts = 3 × 30° = 90°
Since there is an angle of 90° then the triangle is right.
(b)
The shortest side is the side opposite the smallest angle of 30°
Using the sine ratio and the exact value
sin30° =
, then
sin30° =
=
=
( cross- multiply )
2 opp = 19 ( divide both sides by 2 )
opp = 9,5
Shortest side in the triangle is 9.5 cm
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
The given polynomial equation is

We perform the synthetic division as shown in the attachment by dividing by x-2.
This gives a remainder of 0 and a quotient of

This means the polynomial equation becomes:

We factor the quadratic term by splitting the middle term;


Collect common factors again:

The solution is:

Answer:
In our case the least precise is the one with no decimal units, in our case 231 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
Perimeter=2(L+w)
where;
L=length=81.47 cm
W=width=34.2 cm
Replacing;
Perimeter=2(81.47+34.2)=231.34 cm
The most precise is the one with the highest decimal units, for example 231.34 in our case the least precise is the one with no decimal units, in our case 231