Answer:
is right and the registered representative must reimburse the total proceeds from the transaction.
Explanation:
The customer's 1,000 shares "multiplied" to 1,500 shares since ABC split its stock. For every 2 ABC stocks, the stockholders received 3, and the customer should receive (1,000 / 2) x 3 = 1,500. The total value of the customer's stock didn't change since each stock instead of selling at $30, is now worth $20. The problem is that the RR paid the customer only for the original 1,000 stocks, not the 1,500.
If the investor is my client, i will advise him to enter a buy stop order at $40.
<h3>What is the
buy stop order?</h3>
In the share market, these are protective tool that are mainly for short sellers.
Now, as the stock should begin to rise from its current price of $38, once it reaches or exceeds $40, a buy order at the market is entered.
Hence, the stock purchased is used to cover the short position and the investor's profit is the $50 sale price minus the cost of the purchase.
However, because the investor is short term person, the only protective order would be a buy and not a sell.
Therefore, i will advise him to enter a buy stop order at $40
Read more about buy stop order
<em>brainly.com/question/14206094</em>
#SPJ1
when hilton hotels hired ross klein and amar lalvani from starwood hotels, klein and lalvani took many electronic documents with them from starwood. what they did was simply good business and presented no ethical problems.
This problem is a False Statement.
What is ethical problems?
An ethical problem, also known as a moral problem or ethical paradox, arises when a person must choose between two possibilities, none of which are wholly ethically acceptable.
Therefore,
This problem is a False Statement.
To learn more about ethical problems from the given statement:
brainly.com/question/17426643