Answer:
No, the reasoning is not correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
1. To get the correct answer, Akeem should first translate 1L into mL.
1L = 1000mL.
2. We now have the numbers 270mL and 1000mL. (Note: Even though 270 and 1000 aren't equal, we can go with the question.)
3. 270/1000 is how we describe the ratio before it's simplified.
4. Simplify.
270/1000 → divide 10 from both sides to start simplifying. → 27/100
We can't simplify anymore without going into decimals.
5. The correct answer would be 27:100.
P(both red)=(10/17)(9/16)
P(both blue)=(7/17)(6/16)
P(both same)= sum of above 2 = (90+42)/(16*17)=132/(16*17)=<span>0.485
coz both same means both blue or both red
</span>
Answer:
Check the explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Algorithm for finding the new optimal flux: 1. Let E' be the edges eh E for which f(e)>O, and let G = (V,E). Find in Gi a path Pi from s to u and a path 
, from v to t.
2) [Special case: If , and 
have some edge e in common, then Piu[(u,v)}uPx has a directed cycle containing (u,v). In this instance, the flow along this cycle can be reduced by a single unit without any need to change the size of the overall flow. Return the resulting flow.]
3) Reduce flow by one unit along 
4) Run Ford-Fulkerson with this sterling flow.
Justification and running time: Say the original flow has see F. Lees ignore the special case (4 After step (3) Of the elgorithuk we have a legal flaw that satisfies the new capacity constraint and has see F-1. Step (4). FOrd-Fueerson, then gives us the optimal flow under the new cePacie co mint. However. we know this flow is at most F, end thus Ford-Fulkerson runs for just one iteration. Since each of the steps is linear, the total running time is linear, that is, O(lVl + lEl).
Answer:
<h3>ya-z/1+y</h3>
Step-by-step explanation:
Making x the subject of the formula;
y=x+z/a-x
Cross multiply
y(a-x) = x+z
ya - yx = x+z
Collect like terms
x+yx = ya - z
x(1+y) = ya - z
x = ya-z/1+y
Hence the value of x is ya-z/1+y
