1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yuki888 [10]
3 years ago
6

What were two ways the Gracchus brothers sought to help the poor

History
1 answer:
mars1129 [50]3 years ago
4 0

The Gracchus brothers helped the poor by asking the council of Plebs to pass laws to take back land from the Patricians (Pisistratus). Also, they wanted to pass land reform legislation that would redistribute the major aristocratic landholdings among the urban poor and veterans, in addition to other reform measures.

You might be interested in
What best defines cyrillic
valina [46]
It is an alphabet adapted from the Greeks that is used for Slavic languages.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the American Dream of the 1950s? Was it the same or different from today?
Ulleksa [173]

Answer:

1. In the 1950s, the American Dream was to have a perfect family, secure job, and a perfect house in the suburbs.

2. The American Dream transformed into an ideal that relied in people being able to afford all the modern accessories: cars, television sets, and college educations for one's children. Television greatly helped define the American Dream as the acquisition of material goods.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What changes were brought by robespierre in france​
ddd [48]
Maximilian Robespierre,the leader of Jacobin party in France took several reforms. He followed a severe policy of severe punishment and control. His period was known as reign of terror. He forbidden the use of the most expensive white flour, issued laws placing maximum ceiling on wages and prizes.Jun 11, 2020
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the fundamentalist revolt take place
sergey [27]

Answer: What was the fundamentalist revolt?

The protestants felt threatened by the decline of value and increase in visibility of Catholicism and Judaism. The Fundamentalists ended up launching a campaign to rid Protestant denominations of modernism and to combat the new individual freedoms that seemed to contradict traditional morals.

What caused fundamentalism?

The causes of Fundamentalism. Steve Bruce argues that the main causes of Fundamentalism are modernisation and secularisation, but we also need to consider the nature of the religions themselves and a range of 'external factors' to fully explain the growth of fundamentalist movements.

Fundamentalism, in the narrowest meaning of the term, was a movement that began in the late 19th- and early 20th-century within American Protestant circles to defend the "fundamentals of belief" against the corrosive effects of liberalism that had grown within the ranks of Protestantism itself. Liberalism, manifested in critical approaches to the Bible that relied on purely natural assumptions, or that framed Christianity as a purely natural or human phenomenon that could be explained scientifically, presented a challenge to traditional belief.

A multi-volume group of essays edited by Reuben Torrey, and published in 1910 under the title, The Fundamentals, was financed and distributed by Presbyterian laymen Lyman and Milton Stewart and was an attempt to arrest the drift of Protestant belief. Its influence was large and was the source of the labeling of conservatives as "fundamentalists."

Useful for looking at this history of fundamentalism are George Marsden's Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism, 1870-1925 (New York: Oxford, 1980), Bruce B. Lawrence, Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt against the Modern Age (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989), David Beale, In Pursuit of Purity: American Fundamentalism Since 1850 (Greenville: Unusual Publications, 1986), and Mark A. Noll, A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992).

Lately, the meaning of the word "fundamentalism" has expanded. This has happened in the press, in academia, and in ordinary language. It appears to be expanding to include any unquestioned adherence to fundamental principles or beliefs, and is often used in a pejorative sense. Nowadays we hear about not only Protestant evangelical fundamentalists, but Catholic fundamentalists, Mormon fundamentalists, Islamic fundamentalists, Hindu fundamentalists, Buddhist fundamentalists, and even atheist or secular or Darwinian fundamentalists.

Scholars of religion have perhaps indirectly contributed to this expansion of the term, as they have tried to look for similarities in ways of being religious that are common in various systems of belief. Between 1991 and 1995, religion scholars Martin Marty and Scott Appleby published a 5-volume collection of essays as part of "The Fundamentalism Project" at the University of Chicago, which is an example of this approach. Appleby is co-author of Strong Religion (2003), also from the University of Chicago Press that attempts to give a common explanatory framework for understanding anti-modern and anti-secular religious movements around the world.

7 0
3 years ago
What group of Americans rebelled against the Mexican government?
Blababa [14]

Answer: A small group of American settlers in California rebelled against the Mexican government

Explanation: I hope this helps :) You've got this!

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why were the farmers having trouble after the war was over?
    8·2 answers
  • A qualification for president under Article II of the Constitution is
    11·2 answers
  • The berlin crisis precipitated the building of the berlin wall by the soviet union.
    13·2 answers
  • Why was the Articles of Confederation considered to be a failing government after the Revolutionary War was over?
    11·1 answer
  • Which social policy issue did the new deal address
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be the most likely to disagree with
    6·1 answer
  • All of the following were effects of World War I that led to World War II except __________. A. the Treaty of Versailles B. an e
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following issues were to be resolved by the Compromise of 1850? Choose all that apply. A. the process of selecting
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the colonists consider the Townshend Acts to be oppressive​
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a guaranteed basic right according to the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!