The vehicle on the left must yield the right-of-way<span> to the vehicle on the</span><span>right</span>
A group of highly mobile foragers, such as the Netsilik of Canada or Ju/'hoansi, who openly share with each other and in which all men can do what other men can do, just as all women can do what other women can do, would very likely be a(n) <u>Egalitarian society</u>
<u>Egalitarian society</u>
- In an egalitarian society, all are considered equal, regardless of gender, race, religion, or age. There is not a class system in an egalitarian society but relatively equal access to income and wealth.
- Egalitarianism is the equal treatment of all in society no matter their gender, age, race, or beliefs. One example of a proponent of egalitarianism is Martin Luther King Jr who advocated for civil rights in America
<h3><u>What is the opposite of egalitarianism?</u></h3>
- The opposite of egalitarianism is elitism, which is the belief that certain people have a right to have their opinions heard more than others. Definitions of egalitarianism.
To know more about egalitarian society, check the links.
brainly.com/question/1036493
brainly.com/question/1013360
#SPJ4
Answer:
hnrjbn fnj fkrgjkqlwefifuujfoi
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
Answer:
To avoid the ethical issues a true experiment would cause.
Explanation:
A quasi-experiment is a factual conventional study that is used to calculate the causal effect of interference on a target population without an irregular function. Quasi-experimental research shares closeness with traditional experimental design or randomized controlled trials, but lacks the element of random assignment specifically for treatment or control.
Instead, quasi-experimental designs typically allow the researcher to control the assignment to treatment status, but use some criterion other than random assignment (For example- an eligibility cutoff mark).
He primary objective of Podsakoff and Todor’s research was to look at the relationship betweenthe leader’s use of rewards and punishment and the effects on the group’s cohesion, drive andproductivity. It looked at the effects reward and punishment behavior has on followerperceptions, attitudes and behaviors by measuring as a way of leading and moving one’sfollowers. Little research proved that giving rewards had a negative or dysfunctional effect on<span>the group’s process.</span>
