4.9.14

Mathematics

1 answer:

DanielleElmas [232]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

(- 6, 10 ) and (- 1, 5 )

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the 2 equations

y = x² + 6x + 10 → (1)

y = - x + 4 → (2)

Substitute y = x² + 6x + 10 into (2)

x² + 6x + 10 = - x + 4 ( subtract - x + 4 from both sides )

x² + 7x + 6 = 0 ← in standard form

(x + 1)(x + 6) = 0 ← in factored form

Equate each factor to zero and solve for x

x + 1 = 0 ⇒ x = - 1

x + 6 = 0 ⇒ x = - 6

Equate these values into (2) for corresponding values of y

x = - 1 : y = - (- 1) + 4 = 1 + 4 = 5 ⇒ (- 1, 5 )

x = - 6 : y = - (- 6) + 4 = 6 + 4 = 10 ⇒ (- 6, 10 )

You might be interested in

In a study relating college grade point average to time spent in various activities, you distribute a survey to several students

Hunter-Best [27]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

GPA = NO + B1Study + B2work + B3leisure + B4sleep + u

1. No it makes no sense. There is an intercorellation between these explanatory variables. Changing study while holding the rest variables constant or fixed would not make sense. If study us changed then one or more of the other predictors should be changed so that they can still be equal to 168

2. Study is a perfect linear function of work, leisure and sleep. There is the problem of multicollinearity among these independent variables. One assumption of the MLR is no multicollinearity.

3. To reformulate model, you have to drop the variable that is having the issue. Let's say that leisure is dropped from the model. After this the assumption is satisfied.

GPA = b0 + B1Study + b2sleep + b3work + u

6 0

3 years ago

Which linear equations does the graph show the

Digiron [165]

Answer:

Y=2×+13

Step-by-step explanation:

2×+3=0

2×=0-3

you use 3 to divide it self =×

×=3