Answer:
Sharing basic information with customers
Explanation:
The main purpose of Sharing basic information with customers is to increase the Trust level that the customers have toward the company.
During the operation, Sharing basic information with customers could be done by providing the customers with as many information as necessary about the company's status and products (this can be done through websites, phone, or social media) . This will make it easy for the customers to monitor the company activities and understand fully the materials that is used to make their products.
This method could also be used during conflict resolution. Company who wants to share basic information with the customers will respond to negative feedback, conduct a honest investigation, and share all the details of that investigation to the customers, with the hope that the customers will understand the decision made by the company in response to the conflict.
Explanation:
ohhhji thanks for the point
✌✌✌✌✌✌
Answer
The correct answer is Belgium, if this is about WW1
Explanation:
Answer: Rationalization
Explanation:
Rationalization defense mechanism is the technique of defense in which a person tends to make explanation and justification his/her behavior and thoughts through logic so that actual reason can be neglected.It can be presented in admirable and bearable manner through verbal statements .
Other options are incorrect because sublimation unacceptable urge in society, projection is attribution of the behavior and characteristic to other and displacement is redirecting the attitude and behavior from one person to other.Thus, the correct option is rationalization.
The Supreme Court overturn the conviction of Ernesto Miranda in 1966 because the police had failed to first inform Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
<h3>What was the conviction of
Ernesto Miranda?</h3>
The case was related to Miranda who was found guilty of kidnapping and ra-pe and was sentenced to 20-30 years imprisonment on each count.
After the appeal of the case, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession, hence, it overturn the conviction of Ernesto Miranda in 1966 because the police had failed to first inform Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
Read more about Ernesto Miranda
brainly.com/question/2039279
#SPJ1