Answer:
3
Explanation:
They are a big risk to the business
Answer:
The March 31st balance sheet should have $2100.
Explanation:
Candy Inc. had $2000 of supplies on hand. They purchased $2900 more.
Therefore at this time, Candy Inc. had a total of $4900 supplies. See below.
Total amount of supplies = supplies on hand + supplies purchased
Total amount of supplies = $2000+$2900
Total amount of supplies= $4900
They used $2800 in March. Therefore, the March 31st balance sheet should have $2100.
Balance=total amount of supplies-supplies used
Balance=$4900-$2800
Balance=$2100
Answer:
D. Approximately $926,000
Explanation:
To compute the purchasing power of president of the united state's salary in 1940, we will divide 100 by 8.1
= 100/8.1
= 12.3457
The next step is to multiply the above result by $75,000
= 12.3457 × $75,000
= $925,925.93
The above means that in real dollars adjusted to inflation, the president in 1940 earned more than twice the president in 2000
Therefore, 1940 presidential salary measured in yes of purchasing power of the dollar in 2000 would be approximately $926,000
Answer:
A Dominant Strategy
Explanation:
In game theory, a dominant strategy as the question states is a strategy that seeks to be the better strategy irrespective of what other players do. It is also a strategy that will always yield the highest payoff regardless of the actions of other players.
There are two types of strategic dominance:
A strictly dominant strategy will always provide greater utility to the player using it irrespective of the action or strategy of others
A weakly dominant strategy may not always give greater utility but the strategy strives to ensure that the same payoff or utility is attained equal to the strategy of other players and a greater payoff is attained wherever possible.
Answer:
a) Seizing the farms from his political rivals, and giving them to his friends, even when they do not know about farming, will result in less economic growth, because the human capital employed in farming is now of less quality. If things turn sour, a famine could even result (there have been many examples of this kind of situation throughout history).
b) This kind of red-tape will result in less economic growth, because investments that could have been made during the current year, will be postponed at least one year due to the bureaucracy.
c) The government of Tempestia is improving the judiciary, granting it independence and credibility. This will result in more economic growth because now both citizens, and international investors have more confidence in the country, since they feel that their property rights will be enforced, giving them an incentive to invest and take risks.
d) This kind of protectionist policies will likely result in less economic growth because the lack of international trade makes things more expensive for consumers, keeping their incomes from growing, and also because protectionism leads to the misallocation of resources by keeping afloat inefficient economic sectors that under a free trade system would otherwise collapse to give way to more efficient sectors.