1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
d1i1m1o1n [39]
3 years ago
6

Which of the following was NOT true of Renaissance patrons? *15 points*

History
1 answer:
levacccp [35]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I believe the answer is A

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Describe how the relations between the Jamestown settlers and Powhatan Indians changed over time.
mariarad [96]

Answer:

Explanation:

The interdependence of the English and the Powhatans many times seemed one-sided when the English were in desperate need of food and that provided by the local Indians was the only thing between their survival and their demise. The Powhatans’ understanding of the environment and geography was also very important to the Jamestown settlers in mapping the region. For their part, the Powhatans, though wary of the motivations of the English, were very interested in barter, especially in acquiring guns, hatchets, lead musket balls, metal tools and European copper. In addition to the corn they needed from the Indians, the English later came to desire local animal furs, especially beaver pelts, which were then exported to England for use in felt hat production. The colonists learned that the Powhatans wanted English cloth, especially wool, because they did not have comparable materials from which to make clothing and blankets. The Powhatans were accustomed to using traditional stone, shell or bone tools, but soon found that English-made metal tools were more durable and held a sharp edge longer. The strong desire for trade on the part of both parties fueled the off-and-on relationship for years to come. The Indians and settlers understood each other’s needs and desires well enough for successful barter in small-scale items, but their ideas about land ownership and use posed more significant obstacles. The Powhatans did not interpret the concept of “selling” land in the same way as the English purchasers. When the Powhatans continued to hunt on land that the English considered their possession, conflict was a common result.

Captain John Smith had much success initially in obtaining food, farming advice, and geographical knowledge from the Powhatans. Indeed, the fact that the colony managed to survive at all was in large part due to the ability of Smith to speak and negotiate with the Indian tribes. However, by early 1609, his tactics became more aggressive and his tenure with the colony was not long, as an injury sustained in a gunpowder explosion caused him to return to England in the fall of 1609. After his departure, hostility grew between the English and the Powhatans. With the development of new settlements over the next four years, the English began pushing the Powhatans off their land, which fronted the rivers. Fighting between the groups was common, with raids on each other’s land and kidnappings. As more plantations were established along the James River after 1616, relations continued to deteriorate, with both cultures claiming use of the land.

Almost from the first interactions between the two cultures, both groups used hostages or sent intermediaries to learn one another’s languages in order to serve as interpreters. It was hoped that this would encourage “good behavior” on both sides. Nothing seemed to work for very long. The 1613 kidnapping of Pocahontas, a daughter of Wahunsonacock, her baptism as “Rebecca” and her eventual marriage to John Rolfe in 1614 are perhaps the most famous of these interactions. A period of relative calm between the English and the Powhatans did occur after these events.

After Wahunsonacock died in 1618, his brother Opechancanough became ruler. Opechancanough worked to win the trust of the settlers, entering into agreements for land and reciprocal defense, among other things. In reality, Opechancanough believed that the English had treated his people like a subjugated nation – collecting payment of tribute in corn and, in some cases, reducing them to dependence by removing them from their lands. Opechancanough was patient and waited until the time was right. In 1622, he led the first coordinated attack on several English plantations, killing more than 300 of the 1,200 colonists. Jamestown was warned and escaped destruction. This led to a decade of open warfare, culminating in a treaty in 1632. A decade of tenuous peace followed.

Prior to these attacks in 1622, the Virginia Company had dramatically increased the number of colonists sent to Virginia every year, and the population had tripled within three years, threatening Powhatan territory between the York and James Rivers. By 1622, Indians were forced to move inland away from their traditional river valley homes. The lack of communication that existed between the two groups in 1607 did not improve sufficiently to bridge cultural differences as deep and sensitive as land ownership. As a result of the treaty in 1632, the English tried to limit contact between the Indians and the colonists, including limiting trade. In 1646, after a second Indian uprising and the death of more than 400 colonists, the Powhatans suffered a final defeat and signed a formal peace treaty with the Virginia government. This treaty barred the Indians from traveling on the James-York peninsula.

3 0
4 years ago
In the post-Reconstruction era most African-Americans in the South had little opportunity for economic advancement, and worked m
vova2212 [387]

Answer:

Option B.  share-croppers is the answer

Explanation:

Social tensions and schism was seen in between people based on their color, race and ethnicities.  African Americans were taken as share croppers or the tenant farmers.

Jim Crow laws came into existence which prohibited racial discrimination in the public place. Plessey and Ferguson case lead to the amendment of constitution which stated ‘separate but equal doctrine’ which itself inwardly violates the law of equality.

The right to poll or contest in election was not granted and this made the African Americans to migrate to north. Many protests were demonstrated to express their apprehension over ethnic discrimination.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many enslaved people lived in the South in 1810? almost 1 million almost 2 million almost 3 million almost 4 million
nadya68 [22]

The correct answer is D) Almost 1 million.

<em>Almost 1 million of enslaved lived in the South in 1810. </em>

According to the Economic History Association, almost 1 million of slaves lived in the South of the United States in 1810. The slaves represented a valuable property for the owner who sold the slaves for money and they got rich.  The number of slaves in the South after the American Revolution augmented considerably. From 1.1 million in 1810 to almost 4 million in 1860.


7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
B. J. is reading Wonder by R. J. Palacio, a story about a character with physical differences. To best understand what he is rea
lawyer [7]

Answer:

think of someone with a physical difference.

This will cause you to think and understand how that person feels, and better  understand this storiy's character.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement is FALSE about the Nuremberg Laws?
aleksandr82 [10.1K]

Answer:

the 3rd one i think please be correct

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did everybody hate the diaper thief worksheet answers?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did the Articles of Confederation result in a weak national government?
    11·1 answer
  • History question down below
    14·2 answers
  • How does the hieroglyph shown below compare to other ancient civilizations’ writing systems? (Answer in complete sentences.)
    9·1 answer
  • PLZZZZZZZZ HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    7·2 answers
  • Can the same political fate that befell Germany happen to the United States? Explain.
    15·1 answer
  • Branliest answer ASAP!
    11·1 answer
  • Im so confuced i need help quick plz!
    8·1 answer
  • What stance did monroe take on intervention in latin america
    12·1 answer
  • During the 19th century, the Anti-Saloon League: a. advocated the use of alcohol. b. became a strong national adversary of busin
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!