The appropriate response is deregulation. Deregulation, the omission of some administration controls over a market, it permitted or constrained firms to contend by dispensing with many value controls and obstructions to section. The objective of deregulation is to promote competition.
The answer to your question is b
Answer:
There would be a surplus of 2,000 bags, and producers would be happy with the law.
Explanation:
Unlike a price floor that prevents the price of movie theater popcorn from falling below the equilibrium price level of $15, a price ceiling of $5 prevents the price of movie theater popcorn from rising above $20. When a price ceiling is set above the equilibrium price, the quantity supplied exceeds the quantity demanded by 2,000 packets of popcorn, and there will be a surplus supply.
Answer:
c. lower the risk of supply disruption
Explanation:
Having multiple suppliers is always a good sourcing strategy, as it <u>minimizes the risk of supply disruption</u>. If one of the suppliers fails to maintain the contract due to various reasons (bad business operating), the risk is dispersed among a few suppliers, so there is the contingency principle applied.
This way, the supply chain never gets disrupted.
Answer:
$15 trillions
Explanation:
The computation of the GDP is shown below:
GDP = Consumption + Investment + Government purchase + Net exports
where,
Consumption = $10 trillions
Investment = $2.5 trillions
Government purchase = $3 trillions
Net exports = Exports - imports
= $1 trillion - $1.5 trillion
= -$0.5 trillion
So, the GDP would be
= $10 trillions + $2.5 trillions + $3 trillions - $0.5 trillions
= $15 trillions
= 13.5 trillions
