The best ground on which the defendant ( Company S ) can dismiss the suit filed by the plaintiff (Company T) is the standing to sue.
<h3>What is standing to sue?</h3>
Standing to sue refers to a situation where the plaintiff who has filed the case must prove with appropriate proof of having damages or injuries in respect of the conduct of the defendant.
In the provided case, Company T has to prove that the products of Company S are actually defective through appropriate evidence. If Company T can't able to prove their alleged claim before the court, then the case is decided in the favor of the defendant party, that is, Company S.
Therefore, the standing to sue can be used as a ground by Company S for dismissing the claim of Company T.
Learn more about the standing to sue in the related link:
brainly.com/question/14820416
#SPJ4
Answer: 15.35%
Explanation:
The total nominal return over the two years if inflation is 2.4% in the first year and 4.4% in the second year will be calculated thus:
= (1+Interest rate)² -1
= (1 + 7.4%) - 1
= (1 + 0.074)² - 1
= 1.074² - 1
= 1.153476 - 1
= 0.153476
= 15.35% over the two years
Answer:
The amount of the fee is $1689.60
Explanation:
The computation of the amount of the fee is shown below:
= Dollar value × fund charges a 12b-1 fee
= $211,200 × 0.8%
= $211,200 × 0.008
= $1689.60
Since the question has asked the fee amount so we consider the fee charges percentage, not the capital investment Lifecycle fund. Thus, we ignore the Capital Investments Lifecycle Fund as it is not relevant.
Hence, the amount of the fee is $1689.60
<span>A. Medicare provides health care for older people, while Medicaid provides health care for people with low incomes.</span>
My response would be Tiffany is incorrect; a manager's actions can be legal but ethically questionable.
Ethics is a set of morals expected to be imbibed an followed by members of a particular profession. An action is considered legal if the action is in line with what is set forth is the laws set forth.
An action can be legal but not ethical but all ethical actions are legal. Consider a trader in a developing economy. In that country, there is no law prohibiting insider trading so it is legal to carry out insider trading. Even though it is legal, it is ethically wrong to conduct insider trading because a party would be advantaged to the detriment of other people.
Here are the options:
- Tiffany is correct; law and ethics are synonymous and should be used interchangeably in business.
- Tiffany is correct; whatever is legal is always ethical in business.
- Tiffany is incorrect; a manager's actions can be legal but ethically questionable.
- Tiffany is incorrect; there is no relationship between laws and ethics except when the board of directors approve an action.
To learn more, please check: brainly.com/question/13015186