Frank Capra's Why We Fight film series for the United States Army Signal Corps served to highlight the significance of World War II to regular Americans.
Seven propaganda movies called Why We Fight were created by the US Department of War between 1942 and 1945, during World War II. Originally intended to explain to American soldiers why the country was fighting, US President Franklin D. Roosevelt ordered dissemination to the general population. Leni Riefenstahl's 1935 propaganda film Triumph of the Will intimidated but impressed and pushed Academy Award-winning director Frank Capra, who created a direct response. The show had to overcome a number of obstacles, including persuading a non-interfering country to join the conflict and support the Soviet Union. Numerous entries use propaganda images from the Axis powers that have been contextualized to support the Allies and date back up to 20 years. Although William Hornbeck did most of the editing, some scenes were reenacted "under War Department supervision" if the appropriate footage wasn't available. Walt Disney Productions created animated segments, and the animated maps adhered to a convention of painting Axis-occupied territory black.
Learn more about Why We Fight here
brainly.com/question/11740721
#SPJ4
Hiring -
Currently need of a President for the United States. You must be 35 years old and older we must need them to be experienced and wise among the world .Must be resident of our humble home for at least 14 years if more won’t eliminate you as an option if less then yes .Also being a natural born citizen as well. Email resumes at
[email protected] . Thank you !
Answer:
Political scientist Brendon O'Connor of the United States Studies Centre in Australia suggests that "anti-Americanism" cannot be isolated as a consistent phenomenon, since the term originated as a rough composite of stereotypes, prejudices, and criticisms which evolved into more politically-based criticisms. French scholar Marie-France Toinet says that use of the term "anti-Americanism" is "only fully justified if it implies systematic opposition – a sort of allergic reaction – to America as a whole."Scholars such as Noam Chomsky and Nancy Snow have argued that the application of the term "anti-American" to other countries or their populations is nonsensical, as it implies that disliking the American government or its policies is socially undesirable or even comparable to a crime. In this regard, the term has been likened to the propagandistic usage of the term "anti-Sovietism" in the USSR.
i believe the answer is the preamble ^^
The constitutional convention happend
