A numerical factor<span> of a </span>term<span> is any number that can be factored out of the coefficient.</span>
We have to find the mass of the gold bar.
We have gold bar in the shape of a rectangular prism.
The length, width, and the height of the gold bar is 18.00 centimeters, 9.21 centimeters, and 4.45 centimeters respectively.
First of all we will find the volume of the gold bar which is given by the volume of rectangular prism:
Volume of the gold bar 
Plugging the values in the equation we get,
Volume of the gold bar 
Now that we have the volume we can find the mass by using the formula,
The density of the gold is 19.32 grams per cubic centimeter. Plugging in the values of density and volume we get:
grams
So, the mass of the gold bar is 14252.769 grams
Answer:
=5.385 (must look at the requirement of the test as how many decimal...)
Step-by-step explanation:
the squared is equal to 29 means area=29
square has four side equal.
Area=side * side
65.27mm of acid is present in solution.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given,
Quantity of solution = 333mm
Acid Percentage = 19.6%
Quantity of acid = 19.6% of Quantity of Solution
65.27mm of acid is present in solution.
Keywords: Percentage
Learn more about percentages at:
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.
Step-by-step explanation:
The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.
This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.
A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.
To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."
