Answer:
A. 141.4 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
The piramide is 141.4cm
Answer:
8
Step-by-step explanation:
The 110 degree angle is oppoiste to the angle across it.
Using PLT-C the other angle on the bottom of it should be 70 degrees.
since the 70 degrees is on a straight angle the angle beside it should 110
14(8)-2 = 110
Answer: -3 degrees
Step-by-step explanation:
Lets say that the original temperature was "x."
The temperature rose by 11 degrees so it is now at 11+x.
Then the temperature fell by 14 degrees so you subtract. 11+x-14
11-14= -3 so you subtract 3 degrees from the original temperature and there fore the relative temperature is -3
I hope this helps!!!
<h3>
♫ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~Hello There!~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ♫</h3>
➷ Factors are values that the number can be divided by to produce an integer (whole number)
Simply test them out:
29/5 = 5.8
29/9 = 3.2
29/1 = 29
29/21 = 1.38....
As per the statement above, the only factor of 29 from this line is 1.
<h3><u>
✽</u></h3>
➶ Hope This Helps You!
➶ Good Luck (:
➶ Have A Great Day ^-^
↬ ʜᴀɴɴᴀʜ ♡
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women
Step-by-step explanation:
The correlation coefficient between the variables h(height in inches) and pulse rates (in beats per minute) is 0.202
Sample size n=40
Level of significane alpha = 0.01
Create null and alternate hypothesis as:
H0: r=0
Ha: r not equal 0
(Two tailed test at 1% significance level)
Sample r = 0.202
r difference = 0.202
test statistic t = 
df =n-2 =38
t critical value for 0.01 and df =38 is 2.704
Since our test statistic lies below 2.704, we accept null hypothesis
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women
