All categories

3 years ago

What are the zeros of (3x−2)(x+4)

Mathematics

1 answer:

fredd [130]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

x = 2/3 x = -4

Step-by-step explanation:

(3x−2)(x+4)

Set this equal to zero

(3x−2)(x+4) = 0

Using the zero product property

(3x−2) =0 (x+4)=0

And solve for x

3x =2 x = -4

x = 2/3 x = -4

You might be interested in

Jasmine has taken an online boating safety course and is now completing her end-of-course exam. As she answers each question, th

seropon [69]

Answer:

80 questions

Step-by-step explanation:

100%/20%=5%

5×16=80

8 0

3 years ago

What is the value of x? 3x−8=(8x+4 ----- 2

stepladder [879]

3x-8 = 8x+4

subtract 3x from each side

-8 = 5x+4

subtract 4 from each side

-12 = 5x

divide -12 by 5 to get x

x = -12/5 = -2.4

3 0

2 years ago

Each year, more than 2 million people in the United States become infected with bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics. In p

Bingel [31]

Answer:

Null hypothesis:H₀:- There is no significant difference between in drug resistance between the two states

Alternative Hypothesis :H₁:

There is significant difference between in drug resistance between the two states

B)

The calculated value Z = 2.7261 > 2.054 at 0.02 level of significance

Rejected H₀

There is a significant difference in drug resistance between the two states.

P - value = 0.0066

P - value = 0.0066 < 0.02

D)

1) Reject H₀

There is a significant difference in drug resistance between the two states.

Step-by-step explanation:

Step(i):-

Given first sample size n₁ = 174

Suppose that, of 174 cases tested in a certain state, 11 were found to be drug-resistant.

First sample proportion

$p_{1} = \frac{x_{1} }{n_{1} } = \frac{11}{174} = 0.0632$

Given second sample size n₂ = 375

Given data Suppose also that, of 375 cases tested in another state, 7 were found to be drug-resistant

Second sample proportion

$p_{2} = \frac{x_{2} }{n_{2} } = \frac{7}{375} = 0.0186$

Step(ii):-

Null hypothesis:H₀:- There is no significant difference between in drug resistance between the two states

Alternative Hypothesis :H₁:

There is significant difference between in drug resistance between the two states

Test statistic

$Z = \frac{p_{1}-p_{2} }{\sqrt{PQ(\frac{1}{n_{1} }+\frac{1}{n_{2} } ) } }$

Where

$P = \frac{n_{1}p_{1} +n_{2} p_{2} }{n_{1} +n_{2} }$

$P = \frac{174 (0.0632) + 375 (0.0186) }{174+375 } = \frac{17.9718}{549} = 0.0327$

Q = 1 - P = 1 - 0.0327 = 0.9673

Step(iii):-

Test statistic

$Z = \frac{p_{1}-p_{2} }{\sqrt{PQ(\frac{1}{n_{1} }+\frac{1}{n_{2} } ) } }$

$Z = \frac{0.0632-0.0186 }{\sqrt{0.0327 X 0.9673(\frac{1}{174 }+\frac{1}{375 } ) } }$

Z = 2.7261

Level of significance = 0.02 or 0.98

The z-value = 2.054

The calculated value Z = 2.7261 > 2.054 at 0.02 level of significance

Reject H₀

There is a significant difference in drug resistance between the two states.

P- value

P( Z > 2.7261) = 1 - P( Z < 2.726)

= 1 - ( 0.5 + A (2.72))

= 0.5 - 0.4967

= 0.0033

we will use two tailed test

2 P( Z > 2.7261) = 2 × 0.0033

= 0.0066

P - value = 0.0066 < 0.02

Reject H₀

There is a significant difference in drug resistance between the two states.

8 0

3 years ago

Help me please I don’t understand

Mamont248 [21]

For question between 13 -> 17 replace n with the number.

Example:
13.) n = 2; 2+(-1) = 1

7 0

3 years ago

Please Solve This Equation

IgorLugansk [536]

The answer is A 7 7/10

6 0

2 years ago