Answer:
Historical questions are the basis for most historical arguments or perspectives. The desire to know and understanding the past generates a certain degree of inquiry. Historians then develop different perspectives regarding historical questions. These arguments can lead to the development of different school of historical thought.
Explanation:
if u read that hopefully it will help
Well, let's see here...
Hinduism is based on peace and prosperity, and it's a religion that is based on truth and reality which is completely odd in my opinion.
The Guta Empire lasted approximately for two hundred and thirty years (230 years).
The religion and the empire correlate together because the religion is what brought everyone together. With the golden age occurring during some of the time during the presence of the empire, Hinduism flowered and spread throughout the empire (and throughout the rest of India); the religion brought people together and even separated them so the actual beliefs could shape India the way it is now.
A Ghetto, was the location were Jews during the WW2 were marginated, as the expression of an anti-semitic racial policy of Adolf Hitler that became institutionalized.
Most of the Ghettos were established all over Germany, Poland, parts of France. There the conditions for a living were extremely bad: they lacked the most essential things for a living. Many didn't have good energy and water supply. The security of the neighborhood is also compromised. Many unrest can happen and there is little to be done as authorities will not care. As leaving a Ghetto was illegal, the people escaping them were systematically executed.
Perhaps the most representative Ghetto is the nowadays Warsaw Ghetto, that serves as museum and memorial for Nazi crimes against humanity. This Ghetto once had almost half a million people living on it.
Below you can see how many Ghettos mostly in East Europe were later transformed into Death Camps:
The New Jersey Plan was favored by smaller states because it gave equal representation to all states. The Virginia Plan, in contrast, distributed representation based on population, which naturally favored larger states.
