<h3>
Answer: False</h3>
Explanation:
If the sample is biased, then it does not represent the population. A biased sample favors one or more groups over others.
For example, if the sample consisted of only men, then the sample is biased toward men and leaves out women from the group. Hence, this sample does not represent everyone.
Answer:
On the simulation prediction you got a 10% chance
While in the experimental one the average is 42%
Answer:
219 employees
Step-by-step explanation:
3% of decreasing rate of employees per year is calculated thus:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca2e4/ca2e444ce325820f3cb7b209c35c6eaabefec920" alt="3\% \: of \: 810 \: employees"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c84bf/c84bfaee508be649a2e6656057788b08daaf5937" alt="= \frac{3}{100} \times 810"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dae09/dae09c3179eb80d1573720f6e65a1a0d92caf2db" alt="= 24.3 \: employees \: per \: year"
In 9 years,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b9dd/8b9dd79d8ce1996bea47215cb049af8cf8c4d0a3" alt="= 24.3 \times 9"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2300a/2300a4711b19e3f37b986b31e86362f6674a1ad3" alt="= 218.7 = 219 \: employees"
Therefore, the number of employees for a certain company where decreasing rate of employees is 3% and continued to decrease for 9 years; and 810 employees are currently working is 219 employees. By implication, 810 + 219 = 1029 employees were working in the company 9 years ago.
Answer:
8 : 28
x2 x2
16:56
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
45min
Step-by-step explanation:
just mutiply