The correct answer is True
Explanation: When the speaker gets the audience's attention it means that he has made the agenda relevant and interesting for the audience, it is very difficult to get the audience to reach that moment of full interest to what the speaker will say.
See this will help you and please make me brainest person please
Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
Because of the war demands the role of women changed and they had new attitudes, and because men had to go to the war so the woman had to take over.
Answer:
its D
Explanation: I took the test on edge hope this helps :)
