Theoretical probability:
1 ... (16 and 2/3) %
2 ... (16 and 2/3) %
3 ... (16 and 2/3) %
4 ... (16 and 2/3) %
5 ... (16 and 2/3) %
6 ... (16 and 2/3) %
Experimental results:
1 ... 18
2 ... 16
3 ... 16
4 ... 17
5 ... 16
6 ... 17
The total number of rolls in the experiment was
(18 + 16 + 16 + 17 + 16 + 17) = 100
so the expected frequency for each outcome was 16-2/3 times,
and the SIMULATION probabilities were
1 ... 18%
2 ... 16%
3 ... 16%
4 ... 17%
5 ... 16%
6 ... 17%
To me, this looks fantastically close. The cube
could hardly be more fair than it actually is.
Answer:
6 m
Step-by-step explanation:
a squared + b squared = c squared
8 squared plus ? squared = 10 squared
64 + ? = 100
100 - 64 = 36
the square root of 36 is 6
Answer:
(x+2)(x+8)=0
Step-by-step explanation:
the first term x² can only be factored by (x) times(x), and the last term 16 has factors of 16&1, 4&4 or 8&2. only 8 &2 have a sum of 10x (the middle term) so
(x+2)(x+8)=0
Inv1 investment 1
inv2 investment 2
A) inv1 + inv2 = 33,000
B) .04 inv1 + .07 inv2 = 1,950
Multiplying A) by -.04
A) -.04 inv1 - .04 inv2 = -1,320
Then adding B)
B) .04 inv1 + .07 inv2 = 1,950
.03 inv2 = 630
inv2 = 630 / .03
inv2 = 21,000 invested at 7%
inv1 = 33,000 -21,000=
12,000 invested at 4%
4 * 1,000,000,000 = 4,000,000,000
5 * 1,000,000 = 5,000,000
9 * 10,000 = 90,000
8 * 100 = 800
7 * 1 = 7
put it all together
4,005,090,807
Option D.)
Hope this helps
