Answer:
Consumers should not buy from companies that don't source materials
Explanation:
Companies should never have an excuse for not sourcing for their materials responsively and responsibly. They owe an ethical responsibility as well as a duty to offer their customers qualitative products at the best price and that is most sustainable to the environment.In recent times, through the widespread use of social media and the instrument of investigative journalism, it has been able to bring to the surface, the less than responsible activities of many companies in sourcing for their interest of the public and the environment.The 2006 movie "Blood Diamond" shows an avid description of how diamonds are mined and traded in the war-torn country of Sierra Leonne depicting the violation of Human and Child rights and how is excessively enriched diamond suppliers and companies.It is clear that many companies despite the public outcry for transparency in revealing their supply chain in sourcing for their materials still chose unorthodox practices. It therefore, falls on the consumers to spend their money responsibly and make smart and credible choices with their finances by refusing to buy from companies that are not transparent with their source materials.Consumers are the life-wire of any business and the hope of any business survival rests majorly on consumer satisfaction. Researches have shown that companies are no being accountable with the natural resources are utilized and have been used to cause serious harm to people and the environment. Since the companies manage to evade adequate regulations and responsibilities, it falls on the consumers to ensure that their money serves them to the greatest value.
Answer:
The inventory TO is 3.6875
Explanation:
where:
Considering there is not sufficient information to calculate the begining inventory <u>we are going to work only with the ending inventory </u>so:
The inventory TO is 3.6875 This means the company sales their inventory almost 4 times per year.
The company has declared a 100% stock dividend on its common stock will not be considered while calculating the earnings per common shares should be.
Earnings per share = Net Income / Number of equity shares.
where Net Income = $1,520,000
Common equity shares = 300,000
Earnings per share = $1,520,000 / 300,000
Earnings per share = $5.07
Therefore, earnings per common share for year 2015 for Rice Corporation is $5.07
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Based on the information that was provided in the question, Pablo’s case with regards to the scenario given will be regarded as a civil case due to the fact that Drew is being sued.
The Federal court will be the court where the case will hold. This is due to the fact that the parties involved are from different states. While Pablo is from New Mexico, Drew is from California. For speeding, a criminal case can also be brought against Drew.
